TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
|  Deployment costs urban vs rural very interesting
The report actually develops some deployment costs of urban vs rural environments. Summarized, the really rural costs are approx 4.5x as expensive as urban costs. This adds some facts to the arguments about urban vs rural fiber deployment costs.
This chart shows how different areas are characterized by population density and length of runs from the POPs:
This chart shows the cost in British Pounds of what it costs to deploy FTTH to the different areas:
Both charts are found in the full report found here:
»www.broadbanduk.org/component/op···emid,63/
Urban deployment at today's exchange rate is about $690/household.
Rural deployment is about $3000/household.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
NetAdmin
CCNA
join:2008-05-22
| said by TKJunkMail  :Urban deployment at today's exchange rate is about $690/household. Rural deployment is about $3000/household. Both are amounts that could easily be recouped in a five to ten year time frame, ergo, no real good reason not to deploy, unless you consider the whiny investors with the casino-mentality about the market a good reason. I'm pretty sure no CEO or President wants to hear them complaining constantly about how the sky is falling because their short term gains are down a couple of points.
--
---
Eleven years of carrying The Clue Bat... |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| said by NetAdmin :said by TKJunkMail :Urban deployment at today's exchange rate is about $690/household. Rural deployment is about $3000/household. Both are amounts that could easily be recouped in a five to ten year time frame, ergo, no real good reason not to deploy, unless you consider the whiny investors with the casino-mentality about the market a good reason. I'm pretty sure no CEO or President wants to hear them complaining constantly about how the sky is falling because their short term gains are down a couple of points. Without the "whiny" investors, the companies wouldn't have any money to fund improvements. Somehow a company has to provide returns to investors while also doing upgrades. That is why these large scale improvement projects are spread over many years and not done in shorter timeframes as technology lovers and special interest groups desire.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
NetAdmin
CCNA
join:2008-05-22
| said by TKJunkMail :Without the "whiny" investors, the companies wouldn't have any money to fund improvements. You misread my statement. "Whiny investors with the casino-mentality," you know, the morons who invest very short term, and freak when one quarter's results come up short of estimates. These folks are very different from long term investors in that they refuse to acknowledge the big picture, demand that company's reinvest as little as possible and consider short terms gains more important than long term stability and sustainable business plans.
Long term investors with a clue welcome reinvestment in a company and are willing to take short term hits in returns for long term growth.
--
---
Eleven years of carrying The Clue Bat... |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL
·Comcast
| The problem is, they're all buying chips (stock) from the same house. That makes the long term investor more likely to dump the stock with the wild price fluctations. It then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy on why not to invest!
You'd almost need a long term bond issue/that carries a high yield, but even that would need the stability of its common stock.
--
The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
 ·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to NetAdmin
said by NetAdmin :Both are amounts that could easily be recouped in a five to ten year time frame, ergo, no real good reason not to deploy... You will need two things that we don't have:
• Investors with a long term mentality (which, of course, you are denigrating).
• A government with a long term mentality; which means no taxes on the revenues collected for the FTTH services until after the payoff. Can you see government not touching those revenues for five to ten years? I can't.
Oh, and one other thing: Both the cableco and the telco will be expected to build out; but you can't expect the homeowner to use both, so some of the homes won't be paying off for the build out.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
NetAdmin
CCNA
join:2008-05-22
| said by NormanS :Investors with a long term mentality (which, of course, you are denigrating). I disagree with the parenthetical portion that statement. On the contrary, I was denigrating short-term investors who play the market like the horse races or the roulette wheel. Re-read my posts and you will see that I state that long term investors are what allow companies to invest back into themselves and promote continued growth and stability. Short term investors force companies to do the exact opposite by forcing them to focus on immediate returns and punishing companies that don't maximize immediate returns by delaying or avoiding reinvestment.
--
---
Eleven years of carrying The Clue Bat... |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
1 edit | Of course. I knew what you meant, but I'm a "Muslim", after all! (Obama's slip of the tongue will actually embarrass the right, you know!)
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
