matradley
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Ontario | reply to CRTC
Re: CRTC Decision
Wow, that's a quite a few groups that have submitted something to the CTRC in comparison to the last time I viewed that site. Of course, I noted that Telus, Rogers, and Cisco all seem to side with Bell- all companies that have money to lose. XD |
|
mlerner
Premium
join:2000-11-25
Nepean, ON
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| said by matradley  :Wow, that's a quite a few groups that have submitted something to the CTRC in comparison to the last time I viewed that site. Of course, I noted that Telus, Rogers, and Cisco all seem to side with Bell- all companies that have money to lose. XD I still disagree with the CRTC allowing the Cisco submission but I'm not surprised all the Telco and cable companies sticking together. |
|
R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON | That reminds me.... I wonder if Bell's launched their IPTV service yet? 
--
TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
DR_JAY
join:2002-04-23
Verdun, QC
| said by R0CKY :That reminds me.... I wonder if Bell's launched their IPTV service yet? Hi Rocky:
I heard that the IPTV is in the beta stages. |
|
eots
join:2003-02-04
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to mlerner
said by mlerner :said by matradley :Wow, that's a quite a few groups that have submitted something to the CTRC in comparison to the last time I viewed that site. Of course, I noted that Telus, Rogers, and Cisco all seem to side with Bell- all companies that have money to lose. XD I still disagree with the CRTC allowing the Cisco submission but I'm not surprised all the Telco and cable companies sticking together. The Cisco submission was nothing more than shameless promotion of their network management equipment and this never should have been allowed by the CRTC. Cisco's only concern is loss of sales revenue. |
|
