CRTC Decision - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
CRTC @teksavvy.com	CRTC Decision Hello, Whats the update on the CRTC Decision? I can almost guarnatee that the decision will side with telecoms, why? Becouse you have not done enough. At the end of the day Telcomes will argue this: look the throttle has been in for 5 months, people complain, but its nothing major. Everyone just goes about, so its a no biggie, keep it on. BTW here is that 500k from our friends in the Music and Movie industry.
	to forum · permalink · 2008-09-04 10:38:14 ·
andyb Premium join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario	End of Oct like it says on the crtc web site.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 10:39:37 ·
R0CKY TSI Rocky Premium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON	reply to CRTC Ohh... I'm going to go on a hunch that everyone is just waiting at this point to see the CRTC decision.... Call this the calm before the storm. -- TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 11:35:04 ·
only update @videotron.net	reply to CRTC said by CRTC : Hello, Whats the update on the CRTC Decision? only update that can be seen is that CIPPIC, PIAC and the Quebec Consumer Union want Bell and ONLY Bell to pay all legal costs that are climbing daily (last read it was at or near 45K), excluding CAIP (CAIP's Bill scares me). Bell fired back that the costs should be shared by the those who have the biggest stake (ie Bell and CAIP). Yet we know the SOLE stake holder who wants this is Bell. The CRTC did not reply. CAIP did not submit a Bill asking the CRTC to tell Bell to pay it... yet, if they do. Thats the only update so far. "The decision" is "supposed" to come on Halloween. Will this be tossed back if there is an election... no clue. If the NDP come in, they will take care of this on the ministry (industry) level.
	to forum · permalink · 2008-09-04 11:48:17 ·
R0CKY TSI Rocky Premium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON	The CRTC letter of August 8th deals in the decision process ( »www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Lette···808c.htm ) The other link for everything is here ( »www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/···5153.htm ) and CAIP definitely has an answer to the September 2nd letter from Bell, it just isn't posted yet. As for the rest of things you've just posted... no clue. Rocky -- TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 11:54:02 ·
Sweet things @videotron.net	said by R0CKY : and CAIP definitely has an answer to the September 2nd letter from Bell, WOOHOO!
	to forum · permalink · 2008-09-04 11:57:35 ·
NeoStylez Cheers join:2008-02-10 Peterborough, ON	reply to CRTC this definitely is a bit hostile and whats to say what they have done and not told us about. there is some things they havent told us about im pretty sure.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 12:22:04 ·
matradley Premium join:2003-07-03 Ontario	reply to CRTC Wow, that's a quite a few groups that have submitted something to the CTRC in comparison to the last time I viewed that site. Of course, I noted that Telus, Rogers, and Cisco all seem to side with Bell- all companies that have money to lose. XD
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 15:15:54 ·
ultracat join:2008-01-30 Toronto, ON ·Bell Sympatico ·TekSavvy Solutions..	reply to CRTC Interesting news today: »www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/···ogy/home Comcast has decided to appeal the FCC ruling against it re: throttling and restricting traffic. Knowing our CRTC, they will now "delay" their decision to hear what our southern Big Brother has to say on the matter.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 15:51:48 ·
mlerner Premium join:2000-11-25 Nepean, ON ·TekSavvy Solutions.. ·Bell Sympatico	reply to matradley said by matradley : Wow, that's a quite a few groups that have submitted something to the CTRC in comparison to the last time I viewed that site. Of course, I noted that Telus, Rogers, and Cisco all seem to side with Bell- all companies that have money to lose. XD I still disagree with the CRTC allowing the Cisco submission but I'm not surprised all the Telco and cable companies sticking together.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 15:55:16 ·
R0CKY TSI Rocky Premium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON	That reminds me.... I wonder if Bell's launched their IPTV service yet? -- TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 16:19:52 ·
bgw join:2008-06-28 North York, ON	reply to CRTC Rocky, I have been having phone problems this week. Because Bell is out my internet has been wonky too! I've had two Bell technicians around. The last guy was really good. (I will protect his identity.) He stated that three of the new condo towers going up at Yonge & Finch in Toronto have the new IPTV service. The users of this service are seeing 25 Mbps service on their connections. So the service has been launched and is in the early testing mode.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 16:50:45 ·
chagrin67 join:2008-07-31 Toronto, ON edit: September 4th, @06:15PM	25 Mbps ? Is that adsl 2+ in the downtown fiber-loop ? Is that the "expressvu" service bell was advertising months ago, for condos and apartment buildings ? - »www.connectyourspace.com/ I'm sure this has been posted before, but it makes me feel a bit better that CBC released a show using bit torrent and later posted news stories how ISPS were throttling the download. »www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008···cbc.html
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 18:12:37 ·
Guspaz Guspaz Premium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC	Special services in condos is usually either VDSL (ExpressVu condo) or fibre (CityPlace).
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-04 19:09:59 ·
globus999 join:2008-05-15	reply to CRTC said by CRTC : Hello, Whats the update on the CRTC Decision? I can almost guarnatee that the decision will side with telecoms, why? Becouse you have not done enough. At the end of the day Telcomes will argue this: look the throttle has been in for 5 months, people complain, but its nothing major. Everyone just goes about, so its a no biggie, keep it on. BINGO! see »Moronic ISPs!
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-06 14:54:43 ·
Bellundo @teksavvy.com	reply to ultracat Because the FCC was too stupid to slap them with a fine in the billions. Maybe the FCC will reconsider and fine them somewhere on the order of 2.5 billion dollars.
	to forum · permalink · 2008-09-07 02:10:31 ·
DR_JAY join:2002-04-23 Verdun, QC	reply to R0CKY said by R0CKY : That reminds me.... I wonder if Bell's launched their IPTV service yet? Hi Rocky: I heard that the IPTV is in the beta stages.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-07 04:38:10 ·
chronoss2008 Premium join:2008-03-29	reply to CRTC ALL i have to say is like that gay movie store they have the ONLY word that comes to mind FAIL
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-07 10:15:20 ·
Bellox @cia.com	reply to CRTC Well, if the CRTC _does_ demand that CAIP takes part in the costs process, couldn't the "consumers groups" whom most of us have never heard of before just not cash the cheques? Of course, if it does get split 50/50, then the various groups would be out "half" of their inflated hourly charges if they take such a stance.
	to forum · permalink · 2008-09-07 20:21:32 ·
eots join:2003-02-04 ·TekSavvy Solutions..	reply to mlerner said by mlerner : said by matradley : Wow, that's a quite a few groups that have submitted something to the CTRC in comparison to the last time I viewed that site. Of course, I noted that Telus, Rogers, and Cisco all seem to side with Bell- all companies that have money to lose. XD I still disagree with the CRTC allowing the Cisco submission but I'm not surprised all the Telco and cable companies sticking together. The Cisco submission was nothing more than shameless promotion of their network management equipment and this never should have been allowed by the CRTC. Cisco's only concern is loss of sales revenue.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-07 20:36:20 ·


Tuesday, 02-Dec 08:44:29	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF