jgantert
join:2004-06-02
Columbia, MD
| Verizon DNS still ranks POOR
I'm suprised, just ran the tests again, and my Verizon FiOS DNS servers (71.242.0.12 and 71.252.0.12) still come back as POOR. Very suprising. I can't belive they haven't patched them yet!
Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back!  |
|
Shamayim
I already have a Messiah.
Premium
join:2002-09-23
| said by jgantert  :Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back! Can someone explain why OpenDNS remains immune?
--
Who is Jesus? and Why it matters (to YOU).
|
|
Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs: | reply to jgantert
i use Level 3 they ARE 20% faster in ms |
|
jgantert
join:2004-06-02
Columbia, MD | Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched. |
|
Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner Cable
 ·Time Warner VOIP
| said by jgantert :Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched. well on Avg level 3 servers are 7 ms faster then TWC's shit servers |
|
B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
| reply to Shamayim
"Remaining" immune isn't a problem. Once a server is properly reconfigured, you're done, pretty much.
The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap. Pick three.
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function |
|
battleop
join:2005-09-28
00000 | reply to Anonymous_
Hah a whole 7ms. |
|
GemSnake
Premium
join:2000-10-19
3rd layer
clubs: | reply to Anonymous_
7ms will save the world. True story.
Pee. Ess. Give me an effin break! |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to Shamayim
said by Shamayim :said by jgantert :Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back! Can someone explain why OpenDNS remains immune? OpenDNS's founder and CEO says here that OpenDNS's servers were never vulnerable and he posted on his blog that he would explain later why that was the case. But he never did.
»blog.opendns.com/2008/07/08/open···ou-safe/
I’m very proud to announce that we are one of the only DNS vendor / service providers that was not vulnerable when this issue was first discovered by Dan. During Dan’s testing he confirmed (and we later confirmed) that our DNS implementation is not susceptible to the attack that was discovered.
We’re going to write more about this issue in the next 24 hours to address the vulnerability in detail and explain why we aren’t affected but I wanted to get the word out now so that you know you are safe using OpenDNS. Maybe he thought better of putting out on the internet why his DNS servers are immune for fear of giving hackers ideas on how to attack his servers. If I were him I wouldn't be giving out any info that might make life easier for the scum hackers of the world.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
jgantert
join:2004-06-02
Columbia, MD
| reply to B
said by B :The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap. Pick three. (d)Incompetent |
|
B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28 | Okay, pick four. 
-- B |
|
Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs: | reply to GemSnake
yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd |
|
scelli
Native New Yorker
Premium
join:1999-08-07
USA
| reply to B
said by B :Okay, pick four. -- B Here's one more:
(e)-need to be unemployed.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters! |
|
backfeed
is giving feedback
join:2002-12-16
Peru, IN
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast Formerly ..
|  reply to Anonymous_
Not trying to be critical, and I have used Level 3's NS servers a few times in a pinch..(mainly because I can remember the address), But I wonder what L3 thinks of all of the people that use them? I suppose if it was a big issue they would close them up, but since OPENDNS came into being, I have had good luck with them and the price is right .
With some of the filter options we can get, I find it a great service....
thoughts anyone??
--
ERROR: Out of Memory... Should I forget Something (Y,y)? |
|
LeftOfSanity
join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE
| reply to scelli
said by scelli :said by B :Okay, pick four. -- B Here's one more: (e)-need to be unemployed. Should have stopped at (d) |
|
scelli
Native New Yorker
Premium
join:1999-08-07
USA | That's your opinion, but I meant exactly what I said.
Period.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters! |
|
digitalfreak
join:2005-12-09
49533 | reply to TKJunkMail
I'm sure the "scum hackers of the world" are trembling in fear of your quick wit. |
|
GemSnake
Premium
join:2000-10-19
3rd layer
clubs:
| reply to Anonymous_
said by Anonymous_ :yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd You do realize that 20 seconds is 20,000ms, right? Your query will time out way before that.
--
"In a fight between you and the world, bet on the world." - Franz Kafka |
|
Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs: | the page Stalls |
|
