<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy.... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20910237</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:33:26 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:33:26 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21308895</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  shortyd999 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1590424"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I guess that means it wont come to Birmingham for years :(</div>Probably not... although AT&T is being aggressive with U-Verse....   so that may come and prompt them.   However, at&t is already increasing prices... /sigh<br><small>--<br>"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21308895</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:38:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21307742</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1590424"><b>shortyd999</b></A> : I guess that means it wont come to Birmingham for years :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21307742</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:07:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20912678</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  powerspec88 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1445420"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Just a FYI, you can get 10/1.5 with AT&T now.  I don't know what its like where you are, but U-Verse beats everything that Charter has in my area.  The best speed we can get here is 5Mbps and that is if your lucky...<br> </div>I looked up Raymore, it appears to be a suburb to Kansas City.  Where I live is a suburb to St. Louis.<br><br>So Charter doesn't deliver the speed they advertise over there?  That's too bad.  I've always gotten the speed advertised, and even a little more.<br><br>Granted, I was (and still am) on a very low speed business tier.  I just put in an order for a 10/1 business tier.  Hopefully I'll actually get 10/1, especially since business service is more expensive.  At least with it I get static IP and CSRs that actually know something.  For the price I'm paying I deserve at least 95% of the Kbps I'm supposed to get.<br><br>I'd consider U-Verse business, except:<br><br>- AT&T has done stuff I don't like.<br>- You currently can't get Static IP even with U-Verse Business.<br>- U-Verse isn't even available exactly where I live.<br><br>I was also talking about TV offerings.  I could be wrong but I think that with Charter or with DirecTV you can get more HD channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20912678</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:34:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20912243</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1445420"><b>powerspec88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  benc <A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>FIOS I can see that.<br><br>U-Verse?  U-Verse is a joke.  Charter's current offerings beat U-Verse.<br><br>The only exception I might see to that is the extremely limited U-Verse FTTP deployments, but since AT&T has deliberately chosen not to even take advantage of their FTTP deployments I don't see that as a threat.  Only 6/1 on FTTP?  It's ridiculous, but it's that AT&T is doing.<br><br>It's also why I won't buy anything from AT&T, except landline of course.<br> </div>Just a FYI, you can get 10/1.5 with AT&T now.  I don't know what its like where you are, but U-Verse beats everything that Charter has in my area.  The best speed we can get here is 5Mbps and that is if your lucky...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20912243</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20911456</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : Sounds good... Let us know when you actually get it. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20911456</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:36:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20911416</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894476"><b>kommander</b></A> : I live and work in Yakima (some where in the middle of Washington state) with no fios, or u-verse. We are probably going to have the docsis 3.0 proably in the 1st half of next year. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20911416</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:28:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910463</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  KrK <A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Anywhere FIOS or UVerse is.  :D<br> </div>Naturally. the haves always get the cream while the havenots get the sludge.<br>I doubt uverse areas will be included as charter already offers what the top uverse tier is[10mbit]<br><small>--<br>When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910463</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:22:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : Yeah, but why let them maybe steal subs when you can clobber them... nip them in the bud, so to speak.<br><br>I'm betting you'll see this only in areas where the cometition is either 1) Deploying advanced services or 2) Threatening to deploy said services.<br><br>Everywhere else will have to wait... a long, LONG time.<br> <br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910237</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:39:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : FIOS I can see that.<br><br>U-Verse?  U-Verse is a joke.  Charter's current offerings beat U-Verse.<br><br>The only exception I might see to that is the extremely limited U-Verse FTTP deployments, but since AT&T has deliberately chosen not to even take advantage of their FTTP deployments I don't see that as a threat.  Only 6/1 on FTTP?  It's ridiculous, but it's that AT&T is doing.<br><br>It's also why I won't buy anything from AT&T, except landline of course.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910225</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:37:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/811855"><b>TheKnossos</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  KrK <A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Anywhere FIOS or UVerse is.  :D<br> </div>So... Fort Worth hopefully?  :)<br><br>Although Charter offers 16mb here, I've stuck with 6mb DSL because Charter's reliability is laughable. Maybe DOCSIS3 will improve it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910211</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:35:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Easy to see where they&#x27;ll deploy....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910130</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : Anywhere FIOS or UVerse is.  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20910130</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:20:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
