<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Truckroll and byte billing in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20833036</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:31:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:31:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Truckroll and byte billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20833259</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1486994"><b>totalradio</b></A> : Guess I was a little mis-understood (or was a bit unclear). AT&T tried to charge me for a "truck roll", but I called their bluff when they found out I was an ex-tech.  I was attempting to say (and that's my fault that I didn't) that if AT&T insists on a truck roll, don't believe it. Of course, they didn't (and couldn't) charge me for the roll, but its something they might try. They seem to be trying everything else !<br><br>My apologies for not being clear. Totally my fault on that one !]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20833259</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:01:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Truckroll and byte billing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20833036</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1222110"><b>WiFiguru</b></A> : If AT&T goes to usage billing, I will defiantly disconnect my service from them.<br><br>Good review though, and, I do not know why they charge for truck roll with a static IP subscription... makes no sense at all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20833036</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:25:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
