<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Why doesnt shaw do this? in Shaw</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20819639</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:43:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:43:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why doesnt shaw do this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20825826</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : *sigh* shaw has docsis 2 now, its not fully utilized though and docsis 3 testing possibly later in november but very restricted. Shaw isnt ready for 100mb to customers homes EITHER for a ton of reasons, it wont be happening anytime soon so dont get your hopes up.<br><br>If you want fiber, move to a novus building.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20825826</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:00:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why doesnt shaw do this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20822267</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1392497"><b>cableguy84</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by LoyalCanadian    :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  cableguy84 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1392497"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>     :</small><br><br>umm he's pulling your leg.<br>Shaw needs to have docsis3 to do that... they only have docsis 1.1 and are working on 3<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS</A><br><br>sooo potential they COULD do that bu odds are they wont... and if/when they do it will cost a a lot<br> </div>And how would you know they don't have DOCSIS 3 capable equipment beyond the modems? Seems your spouting pessimistic rhetoric too?<br> </div>I never said they didn't have Docsis 3 equipment! They are most likely testing docsis 3 in a test environment... but i am almost 100% positive they are not running docsis 3 on the live network where it would affect most of us if any of us ATM. They may be upgrading equipment and firmware for the switch but most likely not active yet.<br><br>Now this next statement is just an educated guess... but it would make sense for them to roll out docsis 3 in Calgary and area first before going anywhere else, incase of any major issues. Seeing as that is where the NOC and staff that programs all the equipment is located... just like the SDP launch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20822267</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:13:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why doesnt shaw do this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821219</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1453847"><b>internetspec</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by LoyalCanadian :</small><br><br>And how would you know they don't have DOCSIS 3 capable equipment beyond the modems? Seems your spouting pessimistic rhetoric too?<br> </div>Probably because Shaw employees couldn't keep a secret to save their lives.  If they had deployed it anywhere, in any way, someone would have leaked it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821219</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:54:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why doesnt shaw do this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20819639</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  cableguy84 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1392497"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>umm he's pulling your leg.<br>Shaw needs to have docsis3 to do that... they only have docsis 1.1 and are working on 3<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS</A><br><br>sooo potential they COULD do that bu odds are they wont... and if/when they do it will cost a a lot<br> </div>And how would you know they don't have DOCSIS 3 capable equipment beyond the modems? Seems your spouting pessimistic rhetoric too?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20819639</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:46:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why doesnt shaw do this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20812468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1392497"><b>cableguy84</b></A> : umm he's pulling your leg.<br>Shaw needs to have docsis3 to do that... they only have docsis 1.1 and are working on 3<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS</A><br><br>sooo potential they COULD do that bu odds are they wont... and if/when they do it will cost a a lot]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20812468</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:12:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why doesnt shaw do this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20812188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Lack of competition.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20812188</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:07:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why doesnt shaw do this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20812029</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1371214"><b>bushnerd0</b></A> : I got my shaw internet install today (Very happy BTW, solid 10 megabit connection, and up to 20 megabit with speed boost).<br><br>I was talking with the guy who installed my modem, and he said shaw is fully really to provide 100 megabit connections to every house in my city (sault ste marie).<br>He said the reason they are not has something to do with bell. <br>What reason could that be?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20812029</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:32:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
