Uncomm0n
join:2005-04-21
Centreville, VA
1 edit | reply to Phil
Re: Hopefully they won't block VPN access now
said by Phil  :They should charge extra for certain ports, VPN included. This in addition to overage charges on low monthly caps sounds like a winning strategy to not spend money on infrastructure and please the customer base. I hope you're being sarcastic. That in no way would "please the customer base." When I pay for Internet access, I expect all outgoing/incoming ports (except incoming on port 80 and outgoing on port 25) to be wide open with no throttling. |
|
Phil
Rojo Sol
Premium
join:2001-06-11
Camarillo, CA | Yes, I was being quite sarcastic. |
|
steve1515
Premium
join:2000-08-07
Peabody, MA
 ·Speakeasy
1 edit | reply to Uncomm0n
said by Uncomm0n :... When I pay for Internet access, I expect all outgoing/incoming ports (except incoming on port 80 and outgoing on port 25) to be wide open with no throttling. I really hate to see comments like this. I don't really find it acceptable that any ports are blocked. People shouldn't be OK with this. When I pay for Internet access, I expect all outgoing/incoming ports to be wide open with no throttling. |
|
Froggy
@teksavvy.com | You'd love rogers cable internet up in Canada. Almost all the ports are blocked. |
|
quanta
Premium
join:2002-05-07
Toronto, ON | reply to steve1515
Well, you'd want some restrictions on 25 to mitigate spam relaying.
As for port 80...technically web servers are not allowed although Bell adopts a "don't ask/don't tell" policy. |
|
