http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20756103 en Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:25:00 EDT Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:25:00 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20762246 anon : thanks for your suggestion.

However, I discover that whenever I run bit torrent, the NAT table becomes in a seconds. Even though the ip nat translation max-entries are 4000.

I am not sure if the QoS could fix the problem.

This is what i have now.
ip nat translation timeout 900
ip nat translation tcp-timeout 600
ip nat translation udp-timeout 400
ip nat translation dns-timeout 300
ip nat translation icmp-timeout 120
ip nat translation max-entries 4000]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20762246 Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:09:27 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20758456 aryoba : I think your best bet is to implement QoS instead of tweaking the NAT table timeout. Did you check this FAQ before posting btw?

»Cisco Forum FAQ »Router runs VoIP, Bit Torrent, Online Gaming; DynDNS - QoS Sample Configuration]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20758456 Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:30:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20756103 anon : I am currently learning cisco stuffs. so please dont mind.

i have cisco router 2611 and use bit torrent. Ports have been forwarded and i m able to use bit torrent. its pretty damn good. now i m trying to optimize the NAT table values.
this is what i got in config

ip nat translation timeout 3600 (2400?)
ip nat translation tcp-timeout 3600 (900?)
ip nat translation udp-timeout 1200 (600?)
ip nat translation dns-timeout 300
ip nat translation icmp-timeout 120
ip nat translation max-entries 2000

let me know if this is the best setting for BT.

thanks ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20756103 Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:54:44 EDT