dongato17
VIP
join:2000-07-28
Atlanta, GA
| reply to Stealthwave
Re: 900mhz channel scan
I think different hardware has its place in different situations. You may not be able to put 70 subs/AP due to density or terrain, or you may need higher throughput than what Canopy 900 can offer. In these situations, using something other than Canopy could make sense.
Trying hard not to sound like an ad...we have found that a modified MAC works much better than standards-based converted 802.11b/g. We have implemented this on our PTP platform and are porting it now to our PtMP platform. One big downside to standard 802.11 900MHz is the number of false CCA triggers. This really kills performance and reliability.
-Hal
--
Harold Bledsoe
Ligowave
»www.ligowave.com |
