republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco » [HELP] NAT and overload Problem
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Network help please »
« how to know if we are entitled for a download?  
AuthorAll Replies

aryoba
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22

reply to kamal_1352
Re: [HELP] NAT and overload Problem

In general, you can't design such network to expect connection stability. You need multiple routers where one router has single gateway to use to reach 217.174.16.20, one router has single gateway to use to reach other destination IP addresses, and one router as the internal LAN routing to decide if the route should go through the 1st router to reach 217.174.16.20 or to go through the 2nd router to reach other destination.

kamal_1352

join:2008-07-03
Thank you Aryoba for your answer,
after I set overload for all command ip nat inside...
It works true but I have need to set without overload this is my problem!
thank you
Kamal

aryoba
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22

I sense there are more of this story. You mention the requirement of having specific Public IP address to reach specific destination. However you didn't mention the why.

Usually servers need to always use the same Public IP address to access the Internet due to DNS A record among other things. I'm not sure if this applies to your situation.

Therefore let me ask you this to verify. Why do you need to set up such NAT requirement? What are you trying to achieve?
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » CiscoNetwork help please »
« how to know if we are entitled for a download?  


Saturday, 22-Nov 01:44:46 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [198] Obama FCC Selection Team Won't Make AT&T Happy
· [107] DSL's Not Dead Yet
· [85] Zone Alarm Pro Free Just For Today
· [80] Harvard Law Professor Sues RIAA
· [80] Storm Reviews Come Rolling In
· [67] New Xbox 360 'Experience' Goes Live
· [67] CRTC Rules Against Indie ISPs In Throttling Dispute
· [55] Just 26% of U.S. Broadband Users Faster Than 5Mbps
· [51] Cable Grabbing 71% Of New Broadband Customers
· [49] Friday Open Thread
Most people now reading
· CRTC ruling coming Thursday Nov 20 [TekSavvy]
· Pentagon Hit by Unprecedented Cyber Attack [Security]
· Appliance repair bill question. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Rocky - time to offer VPN service to all your customers [TekSavvy]
· Is there any point now in switching? [TekSavvy]
· Core i7 or phenom 2? [PC gaming Tech]
· [iPhone] 2.2 out now [All things Macintosh]
· We're not endorsing internet throttling: CRTC [TekSavvy]
· 80 done, Naxx cleared.....can you say WOW...GG? [World of Warcraft]