<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>well.. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20699288</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:16:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:16:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>well..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20699288</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/244725"><b>SterlingJ85</b></A> : Having been a former TowerSteam customer in the New You City area (Empire State Building). TowerStream could barely sustain 4-5 Mbps through a window. Since we were not able to get the sustained speeds when we tried to upgrade service with them, we pulled out of our contract.<br><br>I'll also let you in on this. The majority of our traffic showed that our traffic was being put on Cogent. (Now, we never had a problem with this really)<br><br>So for them to resell 1,000 Mbps for $1,000 at 8 Mbps for $999.. That's quite the bandwidth profit margin.<br><br>While they brand themselves as true enterprise bandwidth alternatives, their pricing model leaves alot to be desired. They wanted more than 3X's what I currently pay for my DS3 (45 Mbps). And THEY aren't having to pay for Verizon facilities to provide it!<br><br>If they really want to be considered alternatives, stop pricing higher than your competitors!<br><small>--<br>-Sterling</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20699288</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:41:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
