Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6 » ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?
Uniqs:
1287
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  
ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada


1 edit

ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

I am trying to update the following page on ISPs providing IPv6 addresses to their customers:

»https://www.sixxs.net/wiki/IPv6_Enabled_···roviders

Does anyone know whether there are others not on the list that could be added?

BTW the page is not for tunnel listing tunnel providers.

justbits
More fiber than ATT can handle
Premium
join:2003-01-08
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest

Re: ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

How about adding a 6to4 list too?
Several providers have 6to4, although some go through non-optimal paths. (AT+T DSL in my area goes through Sweden.

Sprint supposedly has IPv6 routing, but I don't know if they offer it to customers or not.
»sprintv6.net/aspath/bgp.html
»www.sprintv6.net/Sprintv6.html
"Sprint is currently working on its product offering to include a native dual-stack support for Dedicated IP Access, planned to debut in early 2008."
ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada

Re: ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

It could be added, but I would rather see 6to4 on a separate page. The general idea of the page is to list ISPs providing IPv6 without requiring customers to do extra work. Basically this would help anyone wanting to find an ISP which provides 'native' IPv6 support.

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.

visitor

join:2001-07-26
Manchester, CT

Re: ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

said by ajmas See Profile :

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.
I agree the ISP's that support a 6to4 environment should be added to a different page then ISP's that support dual stack handoff to the CPE.

In Connecticut,USA I've seen that www.netplex.net has advertised a /32 but I don't know if they are providing v6 addresses to their customers.

»www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-r···=2.0&v=6
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  


Thursday, 26-Nov 11:05:32 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [107] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [105] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [68] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [49] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [32] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [31] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
Most people now reading
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Telemarketing Hell: Heather's back [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· No Newegg connection [General Questions]
· pfSense vs IPCop vs Zeroshell vs Monowall vs Tomato [TekSavvy]