Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6 » ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
425
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  
AuthorAll Replies

ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada


edit:
June 23rd, @10:06AM

 ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

I am trying to update the following page on ISPs providing IPv6 addresses to their customers:

»https://www.sixxs.net/wiki/IPv6_Enabled_···roviders

Does anyone know whether there are others not on the list that could be added?

BTW the page is not for tunnel listing tunnel providers.


justbits
More fiber than ATT can handle
Premium
join:2003-01-08
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest
·AT&T Yahoo

How about adding a 6to4 list too?
Several providers have 6to4, although some go through non-optimal paths. (AT+T DSL in my area goes through Sweden.

Sprint supposedly has IPv6 routing, but I don't know if they offer it to customers or not.
»sprintv6.net/aspath/bgp.html
»www.sprintv6.net/Sprintv6.html
"Sprint is currently working on its product offering to include a native dual-stack support for Dedicated IP Access, planned to debut in early 2008."

ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada

It could be added, but I would rather see 6to4 on a separate page. The general idea of the page is to list ISPs providing IPv6 without requiring customers to do extra work. Basically this would help anyone wanting to find an ISP which provides 'native' IPv6 support.

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.


visitor

join:2001-07-26
Manchester, CT

said by ajmas See Profile :

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.
I agree the ISP's that support a 6to4 environment should be added to a different page then ISP's that support dual stack handoff to the CPE.

In Connecticut,USA I've seen that www.netplex.net has advertised a /32 but I don't know if they are providing v6 addresses to their customers.

»www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-r···=2.0&v=6
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  


Saturday, 06-Sep 13:49:34 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [181] Google Browser Available Today
· [124] The Best Bandwidth Meters For Comcast Customers
· [113] Comcast Pays Florida $150K For Misleading Consumers
· [98] Labor Day Open Thread
· [92] Oh Look, Another Ridiculously Huge Wireless Data Bill
· [90] Verizon, AT&T Offer New DSL Promotions
· [67] Google Chrome Runs The Internet Gauntlet
· [65] Routing Around The United States
· [56] iPhone Users Greeted With Morning Outage
· [52] Friday Open Thread
Most people now reading
· Is my landlord trying to screw me? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [new forum] Gay / Lesbian Talk [Forum Feature Requests]
· House Inspection Woes [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Too much oil [Automotive]
· Hurricane Ike heads for Key West and Gulf [Weather]
· [iPhone] Apps not working?? [All things Macintosh]
· [Speed] Comcast Upload Speed [Comcast HSI]
· New "Recovery Fee" on T1 Contract [AT&T Midwest]
· MagicJack Error Broken Storage [MagicJack]
· IMG 1.6 Deployment [Verizon FIOS TV]