KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·Cox HSI
 ·AT&T Southwest
| reply to jc100
Re: Hmmm
said by jc100  :Nope.. not at all. So in order to get around such shaky ground, the RIAA sends someone to download the file and log such activity. There by, they claim the person broke the law and that they now had net losses. Easy fix. That would require breaking the law.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
Skippy25
join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO | Nice try, but if the company they hire to download the files were given authorization to do such (which they would be as that is what they were hired for), then that company is not breaking any law. |
|
Maggs
Premium
join:2002-11-29
Woodside, NY
clubs: | reply to KrK
Wouldn't that be entrapment |
|
GamerGeek
join:2003-07-26
Fortuna, CA
| said by Maggs :Wouldn't that be entrapment That would most definitely be entrapment. |
|
jc100
join:2002-04-10
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Maggs
No. Entrapment is a very tough defense that RARELY if ever works. I mean the police these days pretend to be kids and snare people. The person on the other line is an adult, yet they get them for attempted solicitation of a minor. That is entrapment but they still get those people. That's just one example. The only time I CAN EVER remember the entrapment defense working in a major case would be with Delorean. Delorean was approached by the FBI to sell drugs after his was going bankrupt. T hey then got him on drug charges and he won on the defense they approached him and not vice versa. However, 99.99 percent of the time, you're shit out of luck with that defense. |
|
