<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The customer pays for these lawsuits in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20435117</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:54:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:54:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>The customer pays for these lawsuits</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435117</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344426"><b>bgraham</b></A> : I guess it is a good idea. There appears to be some sense in not taking from the consumer and giving to lawyers.<br><br>I thought years ago IBM published a list of their patents every month or so just so everyone in the computer industry knew what was going on.<br><br>I think patent laws are pretty rediculous. Many years ago a company I worked for got sued for patent infringement and the company holding the patent copied something that had been around for at least 6 years prior to their patent being issued. It cost us a tidy amount of money to prove this and had the patent office looked into the literature that we supplied, the patent office could have denied the patent easily.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435117</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:24:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
