| Only Bell South Its interesting that its only in bell south territory. if it were being done on purpose, why didnt all there areas make it on the list. maybe it is just a crappy network and not done on purpose. AT&T has a only had about a year since the takeover to clean up the bell south territory. lets give em a minute and see what happens. I have had pacific bell/SBC/AT&T DSL for over 9 years in southern cali and no BT problems whatsoever. and ive used several different bt clients. |
|
| 'AT&T has a only had about a year since the takeover to clean up the bell south territory.'
Clean up? Seriously. Clean us up?
Simple answer here. Too many connections across equipment (modems, for one) that can't handle hundreds of connections opening and closing. That's a differentiator between at&t and bellsouth. |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by bogey780:'AT&T has a only had about a year since the takeover to clean up the bell south territory.' Clean up? Seriously. Clean us up? Simple answer here. Too many connections across equipment (modems, for one) that can't handle hundreds of connections opening and closing. That's a differentiator between at&t and bellsouth. I have to agree with this. Bellsouth may have been a bunch of "good ol boys" but they had a much better network than SBC/AT&T with much loftier goals than U-Verse. |
|
|
|
| reply to bogey780
yet bell south is the only AT&T territory that high on the list. not saying AT&T has it perfect everywhere else but... |
|
1 edit | SBC is not Bellsouth. Different equipment and probisioning across the entire network. |
|
