republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FBI: ISPs Should Retain User Data For 2 Years » Why not force the FBI to keep Data Forever?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
35
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
here is a good question »
« No  
AuthorAll Replies

kfw

join:2001-11-20
Norman, OK
 Why not force the FBI to keep Data Forever?

What kind of world are we living in? God knows Credit Collection Agencies keep your data forever, regardless of the statute of limitations.


Hehe

@ssa.gov

You only do a few credit related transactions per day.
You open 1 web page and you hit about 30 files on more than 1 server. A 5 minute web session could collect the same amount of data as 1 year worth of credit info.

I assume the ISP would not be saving the data downloaded, just the URLs. Does anyone know what data would need to be saved by the ISP?

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink

said by Hehe :

I assume the ISP would not be saving the data downloaded, just the URLs. Does anyone know what data would need to be saved by the ISP?
If it's to create the same historic data available from telephone use, it would just be the from/to information (http, smtp, ftp, etc.). Not content. That would still be a lot of data.

If a moderate solution isn't legislated, this could turn out like all the other privacy issues: commercialized and with virtually no legal controls. Look at all the private businesses that aggregate personal information. Like Lexus-Nexus. Their largest customer is the government. This came about due to strong public opposition to the government maintaining a database. So, it's commercialized. The government has access. But, we have almost no protection concerning the privacy of our data. Companies like Nexus sell it to almost anyone. They lose it because they aren't required to adhere to security standards.

I'm not too fond of the government keeping a database. But, the alternative seems to be worse. At least if the government kept it, it would be subject to congressional oversight and legal controls.

My point is, is it better for ISPs to hold this historic information? Everyone knows it will be a matter of time until they sell it as targeted-advertising information. The same people who complain about the government will complain about that.

Mark

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard

join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
reply to kfw
i bet the ISPs already are keeping records of DNS requests for targeted ads.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports
Forums » FBI: ISPs Should Retain User Data For 2 Yearshere is a good question »
« No  


Tuesday, 02-Dec 11:16:17 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [100] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [75] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [59] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [30] EFF Challenges Telecom Immunity
· [17] FCC To Vote On Free National Wireless Broadband
· [14] Clearwire May Slow WiMax Build
· [13] Mega-ISPs, Consumer Advocates Demand Broadband Plan
· [10] Hawaii Telecom Files For Bankruptcy
· [8] Embarq Rejected Higher Offer
· [6] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· [Rant] Bestbuy receipt checker [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Is this a good thing for the net? [news,99366]
· [Connectivity] Union NJ problems [Comcast HSI]
· Level 80 PVP gear info? [World of Warcraft]
· Coalition Government Possible? [TekSavvy]
· VoipO is the Obama of the VOIP world! [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Notice, new uTorrent Alpha may be able to evade throttling [TekSavvy]
· Yet ANOTHER new DIR-655 Firmware v1.21 2008/11/13 [D-Link]
· Upverting DVD players vs Blue ray DVD players. [General Questions]