<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Well Yea in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20359033</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:58:18 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:58:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Well Yea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20362851</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/287036"><b>cghh</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  DaveNJ <A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Of course it falling. Because of 3g. Cdma isnt growing even less. UMTS is the future aka LTE. GSM(UMTS) is the future, even for Verizon.<br> </div>Just a nit, but LTE is a totally different air interface (OFDM) and backend (IP) from both what the GSM providers are using (GSM/WCDMA with MAP backend) and what the CDMA providers such as Verizon Wireless are using (CDMA/2000,EV-DO with ANSI backend). Just because VZW and the GSM providers happen to plan to end up at the same point (LTE) doesn't mean that VZW is adopting GSM.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20362851</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:46:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Well Yea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20359484</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><b>DaveNJ</b></A> : Of course it falling. Because of 3g. Cdma isnt growing even less. UMTS is the future aka LTE. GSM(UMTS) is the future, even for Verizon. Sprint plans to fail. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20359484</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:34:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Well Yea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20359300</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1454619"><b>ISurfTooMuch</b></A> : T-Mobile is interested, but they face a problem.  In many areas, they have a limited amount of spectrum, often not enough to launch a 3G network.  That's why they bid heavily for the AWS spectrum, and they ended up getting lots of it.  The problem is that it's located in the 1700/2100 MHz bands, which aren't being used for cell service anywhere, which means that there isn't much equipment available right now.  That's starting to change, but it will take some time, and, from what I've seen, the CDMA gear seems to be getting to the market first, as Cricket and MetroPCS are already launching purely AWS markets.  T-Mobile has some phones with the AWS bands available, but I don't think they've turned up the network yet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20359300</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:36:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Well Yea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20359033</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1373892"><b>iLive4Apple</b></A> : For AT&T at least, almost every new phone is 3G capable. Networks are going to the next evolution which is UMTS W-CDMA. T-Mobile is not that interested though.<br><small>--<br>I get 29 MPG in my Toyota Highlander Hybrid!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20359033</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:25:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
