<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: TV on a Laptop? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20248496</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:53:40 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:53:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: TV on a Laptop?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20250851</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> : Lots of people watch movies on video iPods.  The screen on the touch or iphone is pretty decent for personal video viewing.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20250851</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:52:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV on a Laptop?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20249064</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : The problem is that if you have better quality, then the mobile phone's battery consumption becomes too high- this is why they can't just use existing OTA signals.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20249064</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:22:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV on a Laptop?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20248915</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wierdo <A HREF="/useremail/u/317310"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It wouldn't look very good on a laptop screen. The individual channels don't have a high enough bit rate.<br> </div>I didn't think of that, but you're right.<br><br>To get a good enough bit rate you'd need lots of speed, which isn't available on mobile networks.<br><br>I guess TV through a mobile really is almost useless.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20248915</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:51:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV on a Laptop?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20248496</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/317310"><b>wierdo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  benc <A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If this means using a mobile as a method to show TV on your laptop, then I don't see what's so bad.  After all, even the smallest laptop screens are much larger than the screens on mobiles.<br><br>However, if all you can do is watch TV on that tiny 2-3" screen, then there's little to no point at all.<br> </div>It wouldn't look very good on a laptop screen. The individual channels don't have a high enough bit rate.<br><small>--<br>It's w<i>ie</i>rdo, not w<i>ei</i>rdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20248496</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:29:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>TV on a Laptop?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20248456</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : If this means using a mobile as a method to show TV on your laptop, then I don't see what's so bad.  After all, even the smallest laptop screens are much larger than the screens on mobiles.<br><br>However, if all you can do is watch TV on that tiny 2-3" screen, then there's little to no point at all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20248456</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:22:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
