Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Despite Piracy, NIN Experiment Still Nets $750,000 » Nobody pays for music
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
305
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
If downloaders »
« Hard Time  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies

bjack

join:2006-01-30
Reading, MA

Nobody pays for music

Please, i don't know of any friend that has paid for music if they can get it for free, unless they are huge fans and want the extra bonus stuff like NIN was selling to try to get some money. SO ESSENTIALLY WHAT NIN IS DOING IS RIPPING OFF THEIR HARD CORE FANS TO GET SOME MONEY WHILE GIVING IT AWAY TO PEOPLE WHO ARE CASUAL LISTENERS!???!?!?!??

Great job Trent - nice way to treat your fans???

What about these issues:

A. So if you give away your music, then you have absolutely no money to start planning and promoting a tour.

B. People say that you get money from touring. Okay, so what is you suck live, as many bands do, or are unable to really set up a profitable tour due to the fact that it's not always easy to do unless you get a proven following who is willing to pay.

Cogdis

join:2007-03-26
Floral Park, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Teleblend
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·LINGO

He really only gave away part 1.
He sold all 4 parts for $5. I bought a copy because I'm a fan and it was a great price.

Look, people who steal music are gonna steal music (unless they get sued for a million bucks). But fans who want to support the artist so that they will continue to make music for them to enjoy will take advantage of this medium.

Meanwhile, trent is STILL making more money than he was making through the label because he cut out the middle man (who take like 90% of the profit). WIN WIN!


Boogeyman
Drive it like you stole it
Premium
join:2002-12-17
Huntsville, AL
reply to bjack
If you notice, most of the bands that suck live are the cookie cutter pop bands that the studios push out.

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to bjack
said by bjack See Profile :

Please, i don't know of any friend that has paid for music if they can get it for free
Then they are cheap and need to ask the manager at Burger King for a raise. Seriously artists have a right to SOME compensation. WTF is wrong with people? If Amazon reduced it's price of DRM free MP3s to 19¢, people would still find an excuse to steal. Frankly if you don't think a song you are going to listen to hundreds maybe even thousands of times over the years is worth 99¢ then it's not really worth owning in the first place.

This whole "The music sucks so it should be free." line I hear from some people doesn't even make sense. If something sucks why do you even want it even if it's free? If I gave you a dog crap sandwich would you eat it just because it was free?


MIRV

join:2000-12-01
Louisville, KY
It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free?


fractalman93
Progressive Music Fan
Premium
join:2004-08-02
Newport News, VA
·Covad Communications
·EarthLink

reply to BF69
I agree. Although I know plenty of casual listeners out there who could probably care less about downloading (much less perchasing) an entire album when they only like one song, I am not of that type. I know what I like and I like what I know. Furthermore, I am willing to pay for it because I am more band and album oriented than 80% of the population. Do I download stuff for free? Sure. But I also support musicians I like by both purchasing their albums and often spreading the word that they are great musicians.

If there are 2 bands on this planet that deserve much more publicity and support than they have ever received, it's Saga and Simple Minds. Both bands have been around since the 70's. Both have more talent than many of their contemporaries --and much more talent than 99% of today's bands. Yet, they have been slighted by their labels and media congolerates such as Clear Channel alike.

Check them out:

Simple Minds

Saga
--
---
"Better the pride that resides in a citizen of the world
than the pride that divides when a colorful rag is unfurled." -Neil Peart: Territories, 1985
.
My blog: »progthinker.blogspot.com


fractalman93
Progressive Music Fan
Premium
join:2004-08-02
Newport News, VA
reply to MIRV
To show your @%$#ing support for the musicians!!


gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
reply to bjack
NIN didn't rip off their fans, the fans that stole the music did.
--
Vista ~ Less functional every day!

AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

reply to BF69
said by BF69 See Profile :

This whole "The music sucks so it should be free." line I hear from some people doesn't even make sense.
*shrugs* The line with me is "the music sucks, so I don't buy it". I may P2P to determine the rate/amount of suck, but in the end, if the music sucks out loud, it all gets thrown off my players, computer, everything.


Pirate515
Premium
join:2001-01-22
Brooklyn, NY

 reply to BF69
said by BF69 See Profile :

If Amazon reduced its price of DRM-free MP3s to 19¢, people would still find an excuse to steal.
True, but IMO the number of people stealing at that price will drammatically increase while the number of people buying music legitimately will increase.

There is a category of people out there who refuse to pay for anything no matter how cheap it is. This is not the category that the music industry should be focusing on. Even if RIAA manages to shut down all the channels via which these people steal, what have they really accomplished for the artists? IMO absolutely nothing. If these people can no longer steal, it doesn't mean that they will go out and start buying music instead. They will simply do without. So RIAA would have simply wasted their time, efforts and money while giving their members absolutely nothing in return.

Another group are hardcore fans. These guys will pretty much buy everything their favorite band(s) put(s) out, no matter how much the cost. No need to focus on these either, as you will be preaching to the choir.

On the other hand, let's focus on the working class category. These are the people who have some money to spend on entertainment and some free time on their hands. Now, if the music they want costs an arm and a leg and comes with restrictions, for some it might be worth the time, efforts and risks associated with trying to steal it. However, lower the price to a reasonable level, and trying to steal it becomes pointless for many. If for a small amount of money you can get the real deal, not have to worry about getting caught and use your time for something more interesting, than why bother stealing it? That is the group that I think the music industry should be focusing on. Again, you can't totally rid the world of piracy, but you can minimize to the point that it becomes insignificant.
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
A MESSAGE to the RIAA and the MPAA: You shouldn't wound what you can't kill...

bigskank

join:2002-06-07
Norman, OK

reply to MIRV
said by MIRV See Profile :

It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free?
Makes perfect since. That's why the bottled water market is doing so badly. I mean, who would pay $3.00 for something they can turn on their tap and get for next to nothing.

Oh, wait...

GPSrob

join:2007-05-21

reply to MIRV
Because you obviously don't get the same thing.

Buying it indicates that it has value to you and in participating in the trade of money for goods you know you're contributing to the welfare of the person that made something you enjoy. Particularly in this direct method when 100% of the revenue hits the original artist who then pays his costs of business as opposed to the other way around when the artist gets paid last and mostly screwed which is actually a disincentive to buy it in the traditional method.


C_
Kill The Socialists
Premium
join:2001-03-19
Aurora, IL
·Comcast

reply to MIRV
said by MIRV See Profile :

It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free?
500,000 of that was most likely trent buying his own crap under a guise
--
"and no matter how drunk you get .. don't lick the wall socket to test polarity..."

maxpower

join:2006-10-09
Providence, RI
quote:
500,000 of that was most likely trent buying his own crap under a guise
Proof?


supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
·Skype
·Cox VOIP
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com

reply to fractalman93
said by fractalman93 See Profile :

To show your @%$#ing support for the musicians!!
There's @%$#ing support for the musicians!! I thought groupies didn't care how good there were.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl


Tzale
Ron Paul - No Bailout Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
NJ, USA
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online

reply to bjack
said by bjack See Profile :

Please, i don't know of any friend that has paid for music if they can get it for free, unless they are huge fans and want the extra bonus stuff like NIN was selling to try to get some money. SO ESSENTIALLY WHAT NIN IS DOING IS RIPPING OFF THEIR HARD CORE FANS TO GET SOME MONEY WHILE GIVING IT AWAY TO PEOPLE WHO ARE CASUAL LISTENERS!???!?!?!??

Great job Trent - nice way to treat your fans???

What about these issues:

A. So if you give away your music, then you have absolutely no money to start planning and promoting a tour.

B. People say that you get money from touring. Okay, so what is you suck live, as many bands do, or are unable to really set up a profitable tour due to the fact that it's not always easy to do unless you get a proven following who is willing to pay.
Oh come on... The main argument behind music piracy is that the cost of a CD is outrageous for what you get ($20 for 1-3 "good" songs and the rest filler)... This is what fed the P2P Revolution a few years ago... With deals like these $5 for a CD, that argument no longer holds true.. They have to charge money ya' know, it's only fair... Would I pay? Maybe if I really liked the artist, but since I'm a poor student, I could use my money in other ways.

-Tzale


Tzale
Ron Paul - No Bailout Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
NJ, USA
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online

reply to BF69
said by BF69 See Profile :

said by bjack See Profile :

Please, i don't know of any friend that has paid for music if they can get it for free
Then they are cheap and need to ask the manager at Burger King for a raise. Seriously artists have a right to SOME compensation. WTF is wrong with people? If Amazon reduced it's price of DRM free MP3s to 19¢, people would still find an excuse to steal. Frankly if you don't think a song you are going to listen to hundreds maybe even thousands of times over the years is worth 99¢ then it's not really worth owning in the first place.

This whole "The music sucks so it should be free." line I hear from some people doesn't even make sense. If something sucks why do you even want it even if it's free? If I gave you a dog crap sandwich would you eat it just because it was free?
Well said... And I'm behind the P2P Revolution, when there is an ARGUMENT to be behind it... When groups set their prices low like this, then obviously I'm not going to side with some loser who thinks everything should be free!

They're the same people who think that me sitting down and coding an application in C++ for a year or two isn't worth $19.99!

-Tzale


Tzale
Ron Paul - No Bailout Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
NJ, USA
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online

reply to MIRV
said by MIRV See Profile :

It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free?
Why?

Because it's the moral thing to do... Obviously you weren't around or don't remember the ORIGINAL reason for the P2P Revolution.... People were pissed at the record companies charging $20 for a CD full of 90% filler music.

Charging a little amount of money is only fair... And don't pull that BS that they're going to make millions even at a small amount... They deserve it then. We live in a free country, and it's the morally right thing to do... If you can't afford it truly, then maybe I'll side with you... But just saying that there is NO reason to purchase something even at a very fair price is simply STEALING...

-Tzale


Tzale
Ron Paul - No Bailout Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
NJ, USA
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online

reply to bigskank
said by bigskank See Profile :

said by MIRV See Profile :

It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free?
Makes perfect since. That's why the bottled water market is doing so badly. I mean, who would pay $3.00 for something they can turn on their tap and get for next to nothing.

Oh, wait...
You can buy bottled water for $0.05 if you buy it in 24-36 pack cases... And clearly SPRING water IS superior in taste to tap water which has a chlorine taste to it. Not all bottled water is spring water.

-Tzale


Water

@oshean.org
And not all tap water is chlorinated or city water.
Forums » Despite Piracy, NIN Experiment Still Nets $750,000If downloaders »
« Hard Time  
page: 1 · 2


Monday, 06-Oct 23:47:47 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [93] It's Cable TV Rate Hike Season
· [62] Half Of New iPhone Owners Came From Verizon
· [48] AT&T Kills Off $20 Unlimited Pre-Paid Data
· [40] XOHM Online In Additional Launch Markets
· [30] Customers Still Annoyed By FiOS Billing
· [19] Verizon Says Alltel Deal On Schedule
· [19] Verizon Pushes Toward a 100Gbps Core
· [9] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· [TWC] TWC SoCal, former Adelphia territory Slowness [Road Runner]
· Texas Realignment Thread - 10/6 [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Valvoline put 5w20 in my camry! [Automotive]
· Heads up; Usenet, "Rarpassgen.exe" virus [TekSavvy]
· New Channel Realignment #2 [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Testify [General Questions]
· Is it possible for women to determine whether Car is Leased? [General Questions]
· Extreme HD and Essentials [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [XP Home] I can't get past blue screen [Microsoft help]