<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Still prefer the DVD over On-Demand in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19937420</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:12:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:12:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Still prefer the DVD over On-Demand</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19939011</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : You're right.  It doesn't.  Which devalues the VoD option and makes it a lot more expensive by comparison.  You also can't put VoD in the kid's car DVD player for a road trip.<br><br>These services are good for couch potatoes with money to waste but until they remove the time restrictions and allow recording on a DVR, cable VoD is only marginally better than HBO.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19939011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:35:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Still prefer the DVD over On-Demand</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19937420</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : Don't thin On-Demand will have all the "other" stuff a DVD has plus it is a lot more flexible and, depending on how much you use it, more expensive than Netflix. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19937420</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:55:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
