republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Friday Open Thread » A rational debate on Comcast traffic management
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
I'll pay a dollar... »
« Unaired 1994...  
AuthorAll Replies


gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA


1 edit
reply to TKJunkMail
Re: A rational debate on Comcast traffic management

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by gaforces See Profile :

said by Richard B See Profile :

»blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=852

Finally somebody get it right also more I hear about it the more I feel those who complain do not know how does a network operates.
This is more doublespeak, using flaws in shared network technology as an excuse.
The end result is still the same, they blocked p2p, which is a violation of network neutrality policys as accepted by the FCC.
The FCC has made no rulings or held hearings or anything else. And they didn't BLOCK anything.

It's nice to know you sit on the FCC with all your inside knowledge.{/sarcasm}
All ye have to do is be able to read.

"In 2003 Tim Wu published and popularized a proposal for a net neutrality rule, in his paper "Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination."[14] The paper considered Network Neutrality in terms of neutrality between applications, as well as neutrality between data and QOS sensitive traffic, and proposed some legislation to potentially deal with these issues. In early 2005 the FCC enforced network neutrality principles in a documented case of abuse involving Madison River Communications, a small DSL provider that briefly blocked VoIP service.

In 2005, the FCC adopted a policy statement stating its adherence to four principles of network neutrality.
In November 2005 Edward Whitacre, Jr. then CEO of SBC stated 'there's going to have to be some mechanism for these [Internet upstarts] who use these pipes to pay for the portion they're using', and that 'The Internet can't be free in that sense, because we and the cable companies have made an investment';[15] sparking a furious debate. SBC spokesman Michael Balmoris said that Whitacre was misinterpreted and his comments only referred to new tiered services.[16]

"
--
‘Do ye, quieting in your bosoms your strong hearts,
Who of many good things have had your fill even to surfeit,
With what is moderate nourish your mighty desire; for neither will
We yield, nor shall you have all else as you wish.’
Solon
Forums » Friday Open ThreadI'll pay a dollar... »
« Unaired 1994...  


Monday, 23-Nov 08:52:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [232] Weekend Open Thread
· [117] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [98] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [97] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [85] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [75] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [74] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [67] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
Most people now reading
· Extra charge to use Master Card instead of Visa? [General Questions]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Rate my website [General Questions]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· TekSavvy Price Increase? [TekSavvy]
· linux box alternative to NetEqualizer ? ? Does it exist? [Wireless Service Providers]
· WoW's Fall from grace [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Smoker's Applecare warranties may not be worth anything [All Things Macintosh]