noping
no route to host
Premium
join:2007-01-09
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to BDF
Re: [northeast] DNS hijacking in effect (new)
xxx.xxx.xxx.14 (the opt-out address) works just fine here. No ads, default behaviour.
Plenty of DNS alternatives if you don't like Verizon/OpenDNS, use 4.2.2.1-4.2.2.6.
That, or roll your own: »ntcanuck.com/downloads.htm |
|
KA3SGM
- -... ...- -
Premium
join:2006-01-17
West Chester, PA
clubs:
 ·Cricket Broadband
·Verizon FIOS
| said by noping  :xxx.xxx.xxx.14 (the opt-out address) works just fine here. No ads, default behaviour. Plenty of DNS alternatives if you don't like Verizon/OpenDNS, use 4.2.2.1-4.2.2.6. That, or roll your own: » ntcanuck.com/downloads.htm NOPING, YES, I COMPLETELY AGREE, use the Level3 DNS servers, they are faster, more reliable, and won't redirect their SPAM pages to your IP address.
I typically use the 4.2.2.2, and 4.2.2.3 DNS servers, and have never suffered a long or re-directed response.
OPEN DNS still offers you up to a SPAMED results page, if you don't have the precise address you were trying to reach.
--
"Lithium is no longer available on credit" |
|
KCrimson
Premium
join:2001-02-25
Brooklyn, NY
 ·Optimum Online
·Verizon FIOS
| I think the directions that FiOS is giving to change the default DNS server are flawed. I didn't get any change until I edited the Broadband (in my case /MOCA, in others /Ethernet depending on how your router was hooked up) setting, NOT the Home/Office DNS setting, as the directions say. I'm wondering if I should leave BOTH sets of DNS settings to the 4.2.2.2/4.2.2.3 servers, or whether I should leave the Home/Office side back to the automatic position. Anyone care to give insight? |
|
gweeper
join:2002-01-04
Southborough, MA
| You have to change it in multiple spots and boy is that actiontec interface lame. Userid that works for the pointy-clicky goop doesn't seem to be effective way to gain access to the CLI.
Of course once wrestling my way through the interface I changed to a server I run and one of the L3 anycasts. Use whatever you like but MEASURE the path first (traceroute at least). Folks saying "everyone should use FOO" are ignoring that topology matters. The reason service providers deploy DNS resolvers near customers is to be sure lookups -part of any transaction- do not slow down applications. Using any distant DNS servers is introducing other variables, possible outages, etc.
The 'opt-out' garbage in this case [paxfire, it seems; www.paxfire.com to direct additional comments] is related only to web browsers. Glad they have unmolested servers available. DNS is basic plumbing and not a revenue stream.
Your best bet, if you don't use bad software, is to deploy a local resolver yourself.
Coffee, local resolver, get on with my day.
|
|
rtcy
FACTS only please
Premium
join:1999-10-16
Beverly Hills, CA
 ·Verizon west (ex G..
·Verizon FIOS
2 edits | reply to KA3SGM
said by KA3SGM :said by noping :xxx.xxx.xxx.14 (the opt-out address) works just fine here. No ads, default behaviour. Plenty of DNS alternatives if you don't like Verizon/OpenDNS, use 4.2.2.1-4.2.2.6. That, or roll your own: » ntcanuck.com/downloads.htm NOPING, YES, I COMPLETELY AGREE, use the Level3 DNS servers, they are faster, more reliable, and won't redirect their SPAM pages to your IP address. I typically use the 4.2.2.2, and 4.2.2.3 DNS servers, and have never suffered a long or re-directed response. OPEN DNS still offers you up to a SPAMED results page, if you don't have the precise address you were trying to reach. I agree and will ad this, ntcanuck's treedns is a caching server so once it get's a name it stores it and next time you don't need to lookit up it get's it from it's cache, i've used since Leo Laporte on techtv turned us on to it.
hey ka3sgm it's a shame the lithium is no longer on credit  I can't live without it  |
|
