dadkins
Merry Whatever
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
 ·Comcast
edit:
September 27th, @12:25PM
| reply to odog
Re: Good for them
said by odog  :Ummm....FIOS? Last time I checked VZ was a public company, but they are definitely a business and very much looking to make an eventual profit. They obviously believe in GPON/FTTH as an effective delivery method for VVD. FiOS?
Where do you see Verizon in this?
»www01.epb.net/index.php?page=new···s&id=136
»www.epb.net/
There is more to fiber than just Verizon's FiOS.
From what I can see, this will be a EPB project - not Verizon.
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
odog
Cable Centric Vendor Biased
Premium
join:2001-08-05
Norcross, GA
clubs:
·Metrocast Communic..
·Comcast
 ·Vonage
| said by dadkins :said by odog :Ummm....FIOS? Last time I checked VZ was a public company, but they are definitely a business and very much looking to make an eventual profit. They obviously believe in GPON/FTTH as an effective delivery method for VVD. FiOS? Where do you see Verizon in this? » www01.epb.net/index.php?page=new···s&id=136» www.epb.net/There is more to fiber than just Verizon's FiOS. From what I can see, this will be a EPB project - not Verizon. He was trying to make a point that no private business would do this because of the money it costs. I wasn't inferring that VZ was involved just pointing out that the second largest phone company in America is doing the same exactly thing on a much larger scale. If anything the costs would be the same if not cheaper than VZ as they have caused the cost of GPON gear to go down in price dramatically. |
|
yock
Eschew the False Dichotomy
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH | No, he was making the point that no private company has yet wanted to do this in the region because of the cost. If private industry sees this as an inviable option, turning it into a government project doesn't suddenly make it fiscally responsible. |
|
odog
Cable Centric Vendor Biased
Premium
join:2001-08-05
Norcross, GA
clubs:
·Metrocast Communic..
·Comcast
·Vonage
| said by yock :No, he was making the point that no private company has yet wanted to do this in the region because of the cost. If private industry sees this as an inviable option, turning it into a government project doesn't suddenly make it fiscally responsible. If Chattanooga was part of VZ's territory they probably would have started building at least part of it already. All the private enterprises care about is ROI, median income, homes per mile. The metrics a private enterprise uses are more tight, but Chat has the homes per mile and income that would have justified doing FIOS there. It probably would only hit the burbs, and not the low income sections but the metrics are there so they would build it. |
|
yock
Eschew the False Dichotomy
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH | I suspect you're right. My own city has three broadband providers, but none of which have any plans to offer FTTH service just yet because Verizon has zero infrastructure here. No doubt Chattanooga is in a similar boat. |
|
