Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon: Please Hold Us To a Lower Standard » Verizon right about one thing
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
58
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Cell phone »
« profitable?  
AuthorAll Replies

bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

reply to batterup
Re: Verizon right about one thing

said by batterup See Profile :

Thank you for finally admitting VoIP and all leeches are a bunch of hustlers out for a blood meal.
Kind of funny since your beloved phone company also offers VoIP... Guess the phone company is a bunch of hustlers too.
--
Prove it...
Save the Internet Time (NTP) service, use the pool.


batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to bmn
said by bmn See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Whether Verizon gets reduced standards or not, the rules should be the same for everyone offering phone service in the state - even the VOIP providers.
A statement without a basis in reality... No VoIP provider can ever provide the exact same level of service as an existing ILEC or CLEC using traditional copper as a medium. To believe that it is possible and should be so is to know little about the nature of the beast.
Thank you for finally admitting VoIP and all leeches are a bunch of hustlers out for a blood meal.


ropeguru
Premium
join:2001-01-25
Bridgeport, WV
clubs:
·VOIPo


1 edit
reply to axus
said by axus See Profile :

What is the benefit of LEC status? How did Verizon get this rule placed on it in the first place?

I imagine that Verizon agreed to something and then didn't do it, to save money. They should pay the fine and then cancel whatever agreement they made, if they don't like the agreement.
These are not agreements between the state, in my case I am discussing Virgnia, and Verizon. They are statutes that are enacted that regulate how the company will do things in order to keep their LEC status.

If you want to read about what is required in Virginia in order to be a LEC, I suggestyou start here:

»leg1.state.va.us/000/reg/TOC20005.HTM#C0427

You may also want to read this in order to better understand what a LEC is:

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_exchange_carrier

--
FWD#: 223611

bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Whether Verizon gets reduced standards or not, the rules should be the same for everyone offering phone service in the state - even the VOIP providers.
A statement without a basis in reality... No VoIP provider can ever provide the exact same level of service as an existing ILEC or CLEC using traditional copper as a medium. To believe that it is possible and should be so is to know little about the nature of the beast.
--
Prove it...
Save the Internet Time (NTP) service, use the pool.

axus

join:2001-06-18
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to ropeguru
What is the benefit of LEC status? How did Verizon get this rule placed on it in the first place?

I imagine that Verizon agreed to something and then didn't do it, to save money. They should pay the fine and then cancel whatever agreement they made, if they don't like the agreement.


ropeguru
Premium
join:2001-01-25
Bridgeport, WV
clubs:
·VOIPo


1 edit
reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Verizon says it is an unfair and arbitrary standard that aren't [sic] applied to its competitors in the increasingly competitive telecommunications market.
And that statement is true. Whether Verizon gets reduced standards or not, the rules should be the same for everyone offering phone service in the state - even the VOIP providers.
Not sure how it isn't the same. Anyone applying for LEC status has to follow the same rules. At least that is the case in Virginia.
--
FWD#: 223611


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

 
Verizon says it is an unfair and arbitrary standard that aren't [sic] applied to its competitors in the increasingly competitive telecommunications market.
And that statement is true. Whether Verizon gets reduced standards or not, the rules should be the same for everyone offering phone service in the state - even the VOIP providers.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
Forums » Verizon: Please Hold Us To a Lower StandardCell phone »
« profitable?  


Wednesday, 25-Nov 02:25:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [103] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [84] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [39] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [32] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [19] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
Most people now reading
· Mysterious $800 Cash Deposit? [General Questions]
· [Rant] Damn Sermons through my speakers! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· "ISP owners could face jail under child porn bill" - CBC [Canadian Broadband]
· Climate Change Scandal Erupts After Email Hack. [Security]
· Came from FIOS to Comcast and.....I'm glad I did! [Comcast HSI]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· [Rant] The Weather Channel [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Child Porn Laws - The Traci Lords Argument [Canadian Chat]