RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
 ·XMission
| reply to ctceo
Re: Interference issues
said by ctceo  :The noise pollution that is emitted is by the older, mostly dead deployments. The later technologies are mostly RF interference free or near free. As always Emergency services in the case of a Natural disaster is a moot point when it comes to the interference. Ah, but is that at certain frequencies that have been notched or at all frequencies? While amateur radio operators are the vocal group, they are also the ones closest to the trial sites and thus currently the most affected (and have an organization), plus we are at a propagation null for the current 11 year cycle.
And true, interference is a moot point during a disaster, AT THE SITE OF THE DISASTER. But the people at the site of the disaster are not pumping 1.5 KW into an optimized beam either, so the people outside of the disaster are trying to listen to a weak signal, and THOSE places are the ones potentially affected by BPL.
But both of these concepts have all been hashed over many times here, and we still have the same ignoring of the entire puzzle and a focus on one tiny piece of it.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. |
