Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Why We Have No National Broadband Policy » Ummn.. right.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
"Because we can't even agree there's a problem" »
« Priorities people  
AuthorAll Replies


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

reply to Thaler
Re: Ummn.. right.

said by Thaler See Profile :

*shrugs* If I had to do a rough guess, I'd say 50-60% myself. Whenever I have a relative move, usually they have broadband avaliable. However, there is also a good possiblity that they might find themselves in a tech void.

I'd say that 94% is accruate...if we count overpriced satellite ISP systems as true broadband. However, if we're judging on affordable consumer systems (ie. $25-40 per month) then it's around 50-60.
Yeah, but he stated that CABLE had 94% coverage in the USA; if that were the case, I'd think that I'd probably have cable by now, along with a lot of other people that I know...

But yeah, 94% broadband coverage, period? Yeah, I'd say that's accurate, but that's only because of satellite.

burger2000

join:2001-06-25
Madison, WI

I think whoever from the NCTA that made that comment meant that 94% of U.S. homes that are passed by cable plant have broadband internet service available.

So whoever stated this either misspoke, implied a very important fact, or is just plain misinformed/lying. I lean towards the first.


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

said by burger2000 See Profile :

I think whoever from the NCTA that made that comment meant that 94% of U.S. homes that are passed by cable plant have broadband internet service available.

So whoever stated this either misspoke, implied a very important fact, or is just plain misinformed/lying. I lean towards the first.
ok, that would make a lot more sense.

Seriously though, would there be any reason that if you got cable TV service that you couldn't get cable internet service?

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

said by Fox McCloud See Profile :

Seriously though, would there be any reason that if you got cable TV service that you couldn't get cable internet service?
Well, I think there are actually services and stations a cable provider needs to put out in order to provide internet on a cable run. Simply having a copper wire doesn't automatically allow it to act as an ISP...until the cable provider has made the investment.

By similar logic, I could also wonder why everyone doesn't have access to DSL...seeing as how nearly every home is phone-wired anyways.
Forums » Why We Have No National Broadband Policy"Because we can't even agree there's a problem" »
« Priorities people  


Monday, 23-Nov 15:06:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [48] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [21] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [19] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [13] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [6] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [4] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Bell's Network Management practices page [TekSavvy]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Extra charge to use Master Card instead of Visa? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Rate my website [General Questions]
· linux box alternative to NetEqualizer ? ? Does it exist? [Wireless Service Providers]
· low moonkin dmg [World of Warcraft]