<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>the problem is low freq modulation in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18077620</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:17:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:17:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>the problem is low freq modulation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18077620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1102813"><b>flushls</b></A> : The best you could hope for with this stuff is a meg or so with lots of packet loss @ latency. <br>I have worked with 900 mhz stuff it is like this on a good day. <br>once you get up it 2.4 - 11 ghz the whole digital modulation thing is better it just requires some sort of line of sight. plus with the higher freqs you have less interference and can reuse the same freqs over and over.<br><br>my .02 after hanging broadband radios for 2 years.<br><br>FCC = Full Corporate Control.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18077620</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:10:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
