AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| reply to rtcy
Re: Good
said by rtcy  :I was careful to qualify my comments with *proven* with today's DNA technology getting better every day, it's easier to get DNA evidence of a anyone that has been with a child, I also know thre will be times when such is not possible, that's when *reasonable doubt* comes into play. So, again, should a test be conducted incorrectly, or evidence tampered with to give a false positive on a DNA test read, then it should be OK to do whatever with the suspect/inmate then?
That's the thing with technology. Nomatter how good we make, it, there's always a human factor involved with things. Now, if you're willing to sacrifice those few falsely incarcerated as simply a by-product of "streamlining efficiency", then that's (again) an opinion which makes me glad as hell you have nothing to do with the justice system.
Just keep in mind, an "open and shut" case presented in court today could very well be the "reasonable doubt" case of tomorrow. |
