Qumahlin
Never Enough Time
Premium,MVM
join:2001-10-05
West Chester, PA
edit:
March 12th, @08:39PM
| reply to N3OGH
Re: Good
said by N3OGH  :Dude I'm not talking about stuff like that. I'm talking about clear cut disgusting acts of sexual exploitation. MOD'S HEADS UP, I'M FLAGGING MY OWN POST IN CASE IT WILL CAUSE TROUBLE. I'm cleaning this up as best I can so the posts stays.. The one that sticks in my mind the most is a close up of a man's "junk" engaged in a certain act with the "most intimate" of feminine areas. The female involved appears to be between the ages of 8 and 10. The picture is titled "Daddy's little girl's first time should be with daddy." OK, defend that.... Edit. Crap you can't flag your own posts. Someone flag this so a mod looks at it ASAP. Your an idiot. Not a single person in this thread is trying to defend it. Your missing the whole point. The point is that by exposing the data sources, your taking a network whose SOLE PURPOSE IS ANONYMITY and taking the anonymity out of it! Tor doing this will just mean less legitimate security conscious people using tor. Noone is going to use a ANONYMOUS network who now says "Well...some things you shouldn't be anonymous for" How long is it before they decide just what else they deem is bad and want to expost
I mean hell you can abuse a child in your bedroom, why don't we remove your curtains?
I can take a sexually explicit photo of a child with a camera...so lets just install chips in all the cameras that recognize naked children and automatically blur them out...better yet, lets just get rid of cameras all together!
Not to mention this will do nothing to stop child pornography. Fetishes no matter how outright disgusting they are always have followers and those people will always find a way to meet, share, etc, etc.
But, once again, if you think ANYONE in this thread is defending child pornongraphy then you are incapable of reading
--
Forum Posts:7500 |
|
N3OGH
Will it all be Obama's fault now?
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Yeah I'm an idiot, the personal attacks go a long way..
I'm all for the anonymity of whistle blowers and journalists...
If a private concern wants to regulate themselves I'm all for it. If the users don't like it, they can find another service. It's not like the government is stepping in and mandating they do ANYTHING.
I guess my idiot self should go back to licking boogers off the windows of the short bus.
What a jackass.....
--
FCC, PLEASE KILL THE MERGER BEFORE THE MERGER KILLS SATRAD! |
|
jays2345
join:2006-05-16
va. | reply to Qumahlin
AMEN!!!!!! |
|
NDPTAL85
join:2002-01-23
Boston, MA
| reply to N3OGH
I have two points to make to you.
1. You are getting way too emotional in your crusade against the kp pervs.
2. A system based on anonymity is pointless if it doesn't make EVERYONE anonymous. If one party can be tracked, then all parties can be tracked. Arguments against kp don't change that. If you can track down the kp pervs then the same methods/programs/devices can be used to track down political dissidents, file traders, and those people who like Joanie and Chachi. »www.sitcomsonline.com/joanielchachi.html |
|
jap
Premium
join:2003-08-10
038xx
·Verizon Online DSL
| said by NDPTAL85 :You are getting way too emotional in your crusade against the kp pervs. You nailed it. Policy making is totally ineffective, expensive, and crippling when emotional, un-equivocated thinking underlies it. Unfortunately, our media-saturated campaign process shuns the wonks we need and elects/funds sound & image bites engineered to exploit emotions. |
|
