  odog Cable Centric Vendor Biased Premium join:2001-08-05 Norcross, GA clubs: | the only bad thing....
Until BT can shed the stigma of being P2P... it is pretty hard to get it mainstream.
BT may be 55% of the internet's bandwidth, but 99% of that bandwidth is illegal  |
|
  Maxo Your tax dollars at work. Premium,VIP join:2002-11-04 Tallahassee, FL clubs:
| said by odog :Until BT can shed the stigma of being P2P... it is pretty hard to get it mainstream. I think you mean the stigma of being a tool for pirates. BT will always be P2P. Nothing wrong with that. Skype is P2P and it has no stigma. |
|
  odog Cable Centric Vendor Biased Premium join:2001-08-05 Norcross, GA clubs: | I see your point, but in most circles... P2P = piracy. |
|
  karlmarx
join:2006-09-18 iraq
·Fairpoint Communic..
| reply to odog But, you've made an interesting point. If 99% of 55% of the internet bandwidth (i.e. 54%) is 'illegal', then isn't the law wrong? I mean, if we say over 50% of the traffic on the internet is 'illegal', then, by definition, it's NOT immoral.
"Group morality develops from shared concepts and beliefs and is often codified to regulate behavior within a culture or community. Various defined actions come to be called moral or immoral." I would argue, if the majority of the population engages in said beliefs, then no matter what the law says, our moral compass has decided that what we are doing is NOT immoral. There are many laws that tried to codify morality, but that does not mean they are good laws (prohibition comes to mind).
So, to summarize. If everyone is doing it, then it's the socially accepted standard for society, thus, cannot be considered immoral, notwithstanding what the 'law' says. -- Stick it to the MAN. Support your local torrent sites. Proudly providing 100mb of upstream for all your TV, Movie, and MP3 needs. |
|
  Maxo Your tax dollars at work. Premium,VIP join:2002-11-04 Tallahassee, FL clubs:
| reply to odog said by odog :I see your point, but in most circles... P2P = piracy. Very true. Especially when they watch the news. Newsmen can simply swap the words P2P and piracy around as desired and most people's brains would process the same thing. |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| reply to karlmarx said by karlmarx :If everyone is doing it, then it's the socially accepted standard for society, thus, cannot be considered immoral, notwithstanding what the 'law' says. Heh... I saw someone try to use this legal defense in court to get out of a speeding ticket. It didn't work out too well for him  -- Only SHATNER is Kirk. |
|
 Cod
join:2000-07-05 Greensboro, NC
| reply to karlmarx said by karlmarx :But, you've made an interesting point. If 99% of 55% of the internet bandwidth (i.e. 54%) is 'illegal', then isn't the law wrong? I mean, if we say over 50% of the traffic on the internet is 'illegal', then, by definition, it's NOT immoral. "Group morality develops from shared concepts and beliefs and is often codified to regulate behavior within a culture or community. Various defined actions come to be called moral or immoral." I would argue, if the majority of the population engages in said beliefs, then no matter what the law says, our moral compass has decided that what we are doing is NOT immoral. There are many laws that tried to codify morality, but that does not mean they are good laws (prohibition comes to mind). So, to summarize. If everyone is doing it, then it's the socially accepted standard for society, thus, cannot be considered immoral, notwithstanding what the 'law' says. Back in the 1940's & 1950's, I would suggest that over 50% of the German population didn't think that concentration camps, exterminating the jewish population & the "final solution" was wrong. By your line of reasoning, are you suggesting that it wasn't immoral? |
|
 openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA | reply to karlmarx Not everyone is doing it. Just because something is not immoral, doesn't make it legal. |
|
 openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to odog said by odog :BT may be 55% of the internet's bandwidth, but 99% of that bandwidth is illegal  Did you just PDOOMA those stats? |
|
  Maxo Your tax dollars at work. Premium,VIP join:2002-11-04 Tallahassee, FL clubs:
1 edit | reply to pnh102 said by pnh102 :said by karlmarx :If everyone is doing it, then it's the socially accepted standard for society, thus, cannot be considered immoral, notwithstanding what the 'law' says. Heh... I saw someone try to use this legal defense in court to get out of a speeding ticket. It didn't work out too well for him  What's moral and what's legal are two different things.
Edit: Oh crap, I posted a response that has to do with karlmarx posting. Dang it! |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| said by Maxo :What's moral and what's legal are two different things. Oh I know, but it was still fun to hear everyone in court snicker as the guy said "everyone else was going 75 in a 55, why pick on me?" -- Only SHATNER is Kirk. |
|
  odog Cable Centric Vendor Biased Premium join:2001-08-05 Norcross, GA clubs:
·Comcast
·Metrocast Communic..
·Vonage
| reply to karlmarx Morality is a personal judgment, and doesn't really have any relevance to the question of legality. I won't get in an analogy war, but using your logic genocide could very well be justified. It certainly has happened before, in Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Germany, etc etc etc. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to karlmarx said by karlmarx :But, you've made an interesting point. If 99% of 55% of the internet bandwidth (i.e. 54%) is 'illegal', then isn't the law wrong? I mean, if we say over 50% of the traffic on the internet is 'illegal', then, by definition, it's NOT immoral. NO.
Speeding is illegal, even though the majority of people do speed. But if you get caught, you still pay the fine. And that fact that everyone speeds doesn't change the fact that it is wrong and puts others in danger. -- -- My BLOG My Web Page |
|
  odog Cable Centric Vendor Biased Premium join:2001-08-05 Norcross, GA clubs:
·Comcast
·Metrocast Communic..
·Vonage
| reply to openbox9 You know it! But ya know... I'm probably wrong It's probably closer to 99.9% Regardless of the exact number it is the lions share of overall BT traffic illegal. Unfortunately it is also a nearly impossible statistic to reliably gather. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to Cod said by Cod :[Back in the 1940's & 1950's, I would suggest that over 50% of the German population didn't think that concentration camps, exterminating the jewish population & the "final solution" was wrong. By your line of reasoning, are you suggesting that it wasn't immoral? Of course he is. He espouses the theory of "moral relativism" ( »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism )where there is no right or wrong except what anyone says it is. -- -- My BLOG My Web Page |
|
 openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to odog said by odog :Unfortunately it is also a nearly impossible statistic to reliably gather. Then the stat, no matter what the number is or who states it, is irrelevant. The **IAs can "make up" whatever statistic they desire (in their favor of course). The root of the issue is how to support BT or kill it off altogether, not whether 99.99999% of BT traffic is illegal. |
|
  kyramilan
join:2006-11-26 Pensacola, FL 1 edit | reply to odog Cuban = Jerk that sold a USELESS Website to Yahoo! for $5 billion.
WOULD YOU PLEASE SHUT UP, MARKIE CUBAN! |
|
  nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :said by karlmarx :But, you've made an interesting point. If 99% of 55% of the internet bandwidth (i.e. 54%) is 'illegal', then isn't the law wrong? I mean, if we say over 50% of the traffic on the internet is 'illegal', then, by definition, it's NOT immoral. NO. Speeding is illegal, even though the majority of people do speed. But if you get caught, you still pay the fine. And that fact that everyone speeds doesn't change the fact that it is wrong and puts others in danger. Breathing puts yourself and others in danger. If you promise to stop doing that, I promise to stop speeding.
-tom -- "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis |
|
 Skippy25
join:2000-09-13 Hazelwood, MO
| reply to karlmarx Immoral and illegal are 2 different things you clown.
Your quote is nothing more then someone trying to spin immoral /illegal for their own benefit. Which is typical of this society that can't accept anything as black and white but must make a gray area out of everything so no one gets offended or has their feelings hurt.
You are also mistaken a majority of traffic as a majority of user's. You can have very few users using a vast majority of the bandwidth and that does not make it acceptable by society standards. |
|
  FLea973 Premium join:2001-02-27 Morristown, NJ clubs:
| reply to karlmarx You are missing something in your group morality claim. I believe it requires the majority of people - the above stats account for traffic - not users. So, if you say that 55% of the traffic is P2P... add that to the what .. 20% (if I recall) traffic being spam... that leaves roughly 25% of traffic for everyone else - government, business (legit), and every-day law abiding citizens... and even then, most of that 25% probably goes to porn.
Every ISP report that has come out reports that the VAST majority of their bandwidth is used by a VAST minority (5-10%) of its user base. Nope, no group morality claim there.
For a stupid analogy - for a given amount of nose picking in public, if 55% of the public does it... thats group morality; but if only 5% of the people do 95% of the public picking - nope, you do not have group morality. -- To the past, or to the future. To an age when thought is free. From the Age of Big Brother, from the Age of the Thought Police, from a dead man... greetings |
|