<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>No divestiture in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17098912</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:55:07 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:55:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: No divestiture</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17106231</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  KoolMoe <A HREF="/useremail/u/314372"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Just as the old radio spectrum licensing was, if you don't use the license for a given amount of spectrum within, say, 1 year, you must give up that spectrum back to the pool.<br>The fear that AT&T will hold onto its spectrum without putting it to use is very real, however potentially foolish.<br>KM<br> </DIV>ATT will probably only build in populated areas (areas with DSL/cable) for max returns, then claim poverty and scream its unfair to be required to offer service with that spectrum, and get a indefinite wavier.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17106231</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:26:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No divestiture</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17106224</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Zoder <A HREF="/useremail/u/617389"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I see that AT&T did not offer to divest their overlapping spectrum with Bellsouth as a concession.  I'm hopeful that the Dems on the FCC will hold out for that one.<br><br>On a positive note, AT&T did concede that they will deploy broadband to 100% of their service area by the end of 2007 as a condition for approval.  85% through wireline and 15% through fixed wireless.<br> </DIV>Satellite is "fixed" and "wireless". :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17106224</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:25:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No divestiture</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17100568</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314372"><b>KoolMoe</b></A> : Just as the old radio spectrum licensing was, if you don't use the license for a given amount of spectrum within, say, 1 year, you must give up that spectrum back to the pool.<br>The fear that AT&T will hold onto its spectrum without putting it to use is very real, however potentially foolish.<br>KM<br><SMALL>--<br>Don't Lie - Be Kind - Realize your Potential</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17100568</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:55:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No divestiture</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17099935</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/617389"><b>Zoder</b></A> : Fixed wireless would be solutions like WiMAX, not satellite.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17099935</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:18:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No divestiture</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17099648</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/832996"><b>jblake</b></A> : as long as fixed wireless does not mean satellite. I live less than a mile away from the end of DSL and cable availability, and cable is never coming and DSL has been pushed back for 3 &#16;years. As long as we get around the same speeds and latency as DSL, then I'm all for it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17099648</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:35:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No divestiture</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17098912</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/617389"><b>Zoder</b></A> : I see that AT&T did not offer to divest their overlapping spectrum with Bellsouth as a concession.  I'm hopeful that the Dems on the FCC will hold out for that one.<br><br>On a positive note, AT&T did concede that they will deploy broadband to 100% of their service area by the end of 2007 as a condition for approval.  85% through wireline and 15% through fixed wireless.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17098912</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:29:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
