<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Found this interesting... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17019470</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:38:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:38:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17026609</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/791002"><b>MrChupacabra</b></A> : From what I've understood from IPv6 is there is still a segment of the IP range for private (internal) use.<br><br>So where is NAT going exactly?  :)<br><SMALL>--<br>If it's worth saying, it is worth saying politely</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17026609</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:54:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17021440</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1290198"><b>elios</b></A> : not if you use a router or hell a linux box with 2 nics in it <br>thall never know]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17021440</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:56:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17021257</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/844746"><b>Joe12345678</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MrChupacabra <A HREF="/useremail/u/791002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Why charge per system?  You're still limited to the total up and down speeds no matter how many systems you run.  We'll still only support one PC to the modem though.  :D<br> </DIV>if they get rid of nat then you may have to pay per ip and 1 system = 1 ip]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17021257</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:28:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17020455</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/791002"><b>MrChupacabra</b></A> : Why charge per system?  You're still limited to the total up and down speeds no matter how many systems you run.  We'll still only support one PC to the modem though.  :D<br><SMALL>--<br>If it's worth saying, it is worth saying politely</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17020455</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:11:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019732</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/844746"><b>Joe12345678</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  LeftOfSanity <A HREF="/useremail/u/1286130"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>"E-router: Related to this is the e-router, a developing spec that will turn the 3.0 modem into a router and do away with the NAT (network address translation) headache. NAT, in existing routers, makes it difficult if not impossible for operators to manage services that hang off the home network. With the e-router, a subnet can be applied in the home that is made more powerful with IPv6 address spacing. "In the old days, DOCSIS was a bridge. Today, the notion is that 3.0 becomes a router that's more in tune with the market and the data that we'll be pushing around," says TI's Peter Percosan. "<br> </DIV>that sounds like it will give the cable providers a easy way to make you pay per system hooked up the the modem and if you try to by pass it they can pull the same legal tricks as they did to the people who uncapped there modem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019732</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:55:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019564</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1286130"><b>LeftOfSanity</b></A> : Congrats.<br><br>Your the only one who pointed that out. I leave it like that on purpose. :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019564</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:21:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019506</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1053031"><b>smcallah</b></A> : I also found this very interesting.  :D<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  LeftOfSanity <A HREF="/useremail/u/1286130"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>your still Retarted!<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019506</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:08:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Found this interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019470</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1286130"><b>LeftOfSanity</b></A> : "E-router: Related to this is the e-router, a developing spec that will turn the 3.0 modem into a router and do away with the NAT (network address translation) headache. NAT, in existing routers, makes it difficult if not impossible for operators to manage services that hang off the home network. With the e-router, a subnet can be applied in the home that is made more powerful with IPv6 address spacing. "In the old days, DOCSIS was a bridge. Today, the notion is that 3.0 becomes a router that's more in tune with the market and the data that we'll be pushing around," says TI's Peter Percosan. "<br><SMALL>--<br>Fighting on the Internet is like winning the Special Olympics. Win or lose, your still Retarted!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17019470</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:02:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
