Re: running cat5 isn't that hard is it? in

Re: running cat5 isn't that hard is it? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16767764 en Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:24:02 EDT Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:24:02 EDT Re: running cat5 isn't that hard is it? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16767764 jeffjs :

said by kd6cae

:

in general, running any internal wiring is an expensive exercise, especially when trying to achieve a good cosmetic effect.

Also, the average service call to install CAT5 in a home is over 4 hours! No one wants a sweaty service guy in your home for over 4 hours.
--
I walk upon this Earth by the power of my own two legs.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16767764 Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:26:07 EDT Re: running cat5 isn't that hard is it? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16764292 bogey780 : They'rerunning nothing. The MOCA and HPNA is only for utilizing existing runs. New runs would be CAT5e.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16764292 Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:40:53 EDT Re: running cat5 isn't that hard is it? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16764290 DMS1 :

said by kd6cae

:

OK why are they so interested in running coax all of a sudden if they're already running cat5 now?

They aren't. What they are interested in is using the existing coax that is already there. You say that running Cat 5 isn't hard, but, in general, running any internal wiring is an expensive exercise, especially when trying to achieve a good cosmetic effect.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16764290 Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:40:38 EDT running cat5 isn't that hard is it? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16763846 kd6cae : OK why are they so interested in running coax all of a sudden if they're already running cat5 now?
Why didn't they start with coax to begin with? So if I understand it right, the path would go fiber to coax to small run of cat5 at your computer? I guess that'd work.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16763846 Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:37:15 EDT