<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: HPNA dead in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16765070</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:43:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:43:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: HPNA dead</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16765070</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/910659"><b>inteller</b></A> : you can't.  I went to the HPNA site and no one is offering devices that are v3.  Hell if 3.0 hpna actually worked why would we need wireless?  I think either the technology isnt really there or the Wi-Fi alliance paid them off.  Who WOULDN'T want to take advantage of existing wiring free of RF interference that sinks wifi.<br><SMALL>--<br>"WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16765070</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:38:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HPNA dead</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16764353</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : isnt HPNA dead? Where can I get as a consumer a HPNA 3 (over 10mbs) device that isnt integrated into something else and proprietory?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16764353</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:50:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
