<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16682714</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:07:53 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:07:53 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16687338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1230347"><b>backness</b></A> : ok i agree now <br><br>:)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16687338</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:42:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686978</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344321"><b>bmn</b></A> : While they have been recognized as legal persons, they were not always granted the same rights as coporeal persons.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Extremes to the right and left of any political dispute are always wrong."<br>&#151;Dwight Eisenhower</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686978</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:34:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686420</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1230347"><b>backness</b></A> : corporations are considered individuals]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686420</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:49:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684946</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344321"><b>bmn</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  richardpor <A HREF="/useremail/u/801387"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I recalled that corporations are made of individuals. There is no difference between corporation or  individuals when it comes to our freedoms granted in  constitution.  </DIV>Then the Constitution applies to the individuals within the corporation, not the corporation itself.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Extremes to the right and left of any political dispute are always wrong."<br>&#151;Dwight Eisenhower</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684946</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:47:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684772</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/801387"><b>richardpor</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  owenhome <A HREF="/useremail/u/657733"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>The Constitution makes no reference to free speech for corporations, only individuals.  Besides, if he's being paid for it, it's hardly "free speech".  Seems to me it's about as free as he is and I'll bet his salary is pretty steep.<br><br>Deceptive trade practices are illegal and this borders DAMN CLOSE to that.  Will any thing be done about it?  Not in this country.  At least, not as long as these companies keep funneling cash into the mouths of our noble officials.<br><br>It's just another way to lobby.  A damned despicable one, but that's all it is.<br><br>Again, welcome to the USA Inc.<br> </DIV>I recalled that corporations are made of individuals. There is no difference between corporation or  individuals when it comes to our freedoms granted in  constitution. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684772</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:11:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684605</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/657733"><b>owenhome</b></A> : The Constitution makes no reference to free speech for corporations, only individuals.  Besides, if he's being paid for it, it's hardly "free speech".  Seems to me it's about as free as he is and I'll bet his salary is pretty steep.<br><br>Deceptive trade practices are illegal and this borders DAMN CLOSE to that.  Will any thing be done about it?  Not in this country.  At least, not as long as these companies keep funneling cash into the mouths of our noble officials.<br><br>It's just another way to lobby.  A damned despicable one, but that's all it is.<br><br>Again, welcome to the USA Inc.<br><SMALL>--<br>Never argue with a fool, people might not know the difference.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684605</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:37:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16682714</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/801945"><b>bigjimc</b></A> : Absolutely.  I think that AT&T is deceptively spending the stock holders money.  There should be a regulation that states that any company spending stockholders money on paid opinion should notify us.<br><br>This regulation should treat these opinions similar to a political advertisement (as they are).<br><br>I agree that this deception is wrong.<br><br>*The preceding was not a paid advertisement by anyone*<br><SMALL>--<br>Just my 2 cents...Flame Lightly...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16682714</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:32:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16682109</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/738578"><b>Stumbles</b></A> : Well yeah, opinions are fine and there is nothing wrong with an individual or company stating one. <br><br>BUT... when an individual or company hides behind and organization, funds said organization AND leads everyone to believe the organization is one thing BUT is in FACT simply a front.... then that is nothing short of DECEPTION. misleading and LYING.<br><br>And who says there is no such thing as conspiracy theories.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16682109</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:00:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681714</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/698757"><b>nixen</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bigjimc <A HREF="/useremail/u/801945"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>We don;t have laws against it because of the Constitution of the United States gives all of us the unalienable rights to our opinions.<br><br>Notice.."opinions".  No matter how much I HATE their opinion.  Thankfully there are others exposing these paid opinions.<br> </DIV>Opinions are one thing. Deception is another. If AT&T needs to express an opinion, they should do so. Hiding behind a "grass roots" campaign of "real citizens" smacks of deception.<br><br>-tom<br><SMALL>--<br>"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681714</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:05:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681687</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/801945"><b>bigjimc</b></A> : We don;t have laws against it because of the Constitution of the United States gives all of us the unalienable rights to our opinions.<br><br>Notice.."opinions".  No matter how much I HATE their opinion.  Thankfully there are others exposing these paid opinions.<br><SMALL>--<br>Just my 2 cents...Flame Lightly...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681687</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:00:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681382</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : We don't have laws against this because law firms make huge amounts of money running these operations.<br><SMALL>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681382</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:20:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why dont we have laws against this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681187</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><b>PhoenixDown</b></A> : Or laws stating that they are representatives of these companies which they most certainly are.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.masstransitsucks.com">Mass Transit Sucks!</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681187</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:53:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
