<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>dejavu all over again... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16535028</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:42:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:42:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>dejavu all over again...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16535028</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/995903"><b>tmc8080</b></A> : You see, satellite providers are quickly becoming the ones who are left standing when the music stops (without a chair). Or up the creek without a revenue stream.. well-- they could gouge customers with higher fees, but that's a zero-sum game, as in zero customer base.<br><br>Alot of speculation that cell phone carriers won't be 1-up'd in their own space (wireless) keep promising higher speed, lower cost wireless but are stuck between greed (rock solid greed) and a diamond minefield of tax levy authorities in the communities which they operate (that would be the hard place).<br><br>Now come along the poor beaten down satellite tv providers losing their marketshare to technology(cough, cough FIOS)... boo hoo, whoah as them, then along comes WI-Max.. and the promise of selling wireless broadband with low latency that does the side-step (texas style) around municipality fees/tax levy/usf fund (well.. maybe not usf, but can't a guy named Rupert dream).<br><br>This is why WIMAX may never see the light of day as a regular consumer product, it may become a SERVICE PROVIDER's product (robotic arms and legs) with their own authentication hand-shake protocols built-in. Dont' forget where this is heading people... your satellite receivers will become "smart two-way" equipment for security and location beaconing. So you couldn't activate a unit for your granny in FL if you live in NY without a wimax beacon finding out about it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16535028</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:36:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
