<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Fixed wireless is not for rural broadband in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16069330</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:40:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:40:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Fixed wireless is not for rural broadband</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069330</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><b>markopoleo</b></A> : I think AT&T does not realize how hard fixed wireless is, esp in Missouri.  So many trees, hills its not for rural areas.<br><br>Roll the fiber or shut up AT&T.  Lobby the government for money to do it if you have to. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069330</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:03:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
