<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>oh my... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16022598</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:06:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:06:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: oh my...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16027785</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/952564"><b>Devistater</b></A> : No, the draft standard was up for a vote to move it to next level and it didn't pass. Thats what the news thing above says, RTFA.<br>Hint: Check out the timeline on the 802.11g standard<br>At this point we are at today, it took 1 more year to get the final standard.<br><br>So, expect to wait a year from now to be able to buy 802.11n standardized stuff. Until then, you are playing russian roulette. Its highly unlikely that any pre-N stuff you buy will work completly with the final standard, and its even more unlikly that you will be able to upgrade it. So if you dont mind replacing equipment in a year, go ahead.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16027785</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 04:40:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>oh my...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16022598</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1013763"><b>Asmodeus</b></A> : what's the problem... they've already ratified the .11n standard right...? so start developing till you drop... it's good for everyone who wants this type of equipment... otherwise why are these people in business...?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16022598</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 13:44:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
