<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Fine and Dandy... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15786368</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:11:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:11:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Fine and Dandy...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15791623</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/202891"><b>shashinka</b></A> : Most likely this wouldn't be available in the sticks either or it maybe a long time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15791623</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:18:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fine and Dandy...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15788309</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/182519"><b>rradina</b></A> : I second that.  I've had both Dish and DirecTV and prefer either to cable.  However, I want broadband and bundled discounts offered by cable made me get rid of the dish.<br><br>If DirecTV and/or Dish can offer a WiMax solution with a bundled TV/VOD/DVR/broadband package, I'd love to have a competitive option.<br><br>Of course it's not enough to offer 1Mbps.  I'd expect several Mbps service, reasonable price, no port blocking or GB/month caps etc, etc, etc.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15788309</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:00:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fine and Dandy...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15786368</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894853"><b>poolek</b></A> : It's not satellite - it's terestrial wireless/wimax.  Latency won't be an issue.<br><br>I'd be interested in it.  I currently use DirecTV and prefer it to the cable offerings in my area.  If they offered a decent competitor price, speed and stability wise to the cable or DSL offerings I can get, I would certainly consider switching.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15786368</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:17:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Fine and Dandy...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15786202</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1092082"><b>Cjaiceman</b></A> : ... but I'm still going to stick with Qwest DSL for now. I highly doubt that they will offer 7Mbps for $35/month... Plus the latency will be an issue as I am a gamer.... But, for those out in the sticks that can't get anything other than satellite this is a good option if they do it right!<br><br>They are also going to have a hard time convincing people with cable that are getting 10+mbps to switch to a lower service for about the same price (if they price it ~$40-$60/month).<br><br>Personally I think they should target areas that don't have any broadband options (other than satellite). ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15786202</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:52:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
