<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Speeds in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15467124</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:23:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:23:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15470550</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1321075"><b>macken 657</b></A> : deployment has a lot to do with a state's franchise agreements, for instance, Texas eliminated the need for T to get agreements from each city, now only has to set agreements at the state level. 2 things happened as a result, T has greatly increased their IP deployment and Charter CATV has announced lower prices ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15470550</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:11:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243978"><b>Zorglub</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Folic <A HREF="/useremail/u/1087045"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>6MB/s max with IPTV, but they are expected to diliver upto 25MB/s for users without the IPTV service, but wont believe it till i see it.<br> </DIV>Wow, makes me want to get fiber only and keep Directv for my TVs...  Maybe somebody can explain me why I should be excited about IP TV.  It seems to me that we're trying to solve a technical problem that does not exist.  That 19 MBps is not enough to supply 4 video feeds if 2 or 3 of them will be HD, so what's the point?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467652</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:52:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467527</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/322004"><b>pepperxn</b></A> : SBC bought out AT&T, and took the AT&T name, and changed the logo. Think of it as SBC with the AT&T name and logo.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467527</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:35:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467450</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1073405"><b>cool_coda</b></A> : Now that AT&T bought out SBC I am very interested in the developments of the project moving forward.  But being around these parts (DSLunderground) they have been promising stuff for years.  <br><br>So, I will sit patiently with the wait and see attitude.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467450</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:25:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467124</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1087045"><b>Folic</b></A> : 6MB/s max with IPTV, but they are expected to diliver upto 25MB/s for users without the IPTV service, but wont believe it till i see it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467124</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:39:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
