<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Another investment scam? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15057286</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:52:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:52:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Another investment scam?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15057286</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : There's the rub ... that is where it is LEAST technically feasible where you have long lines and lots of attenuation of the signals and lots of chance for radiation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15057286</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:46:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Another investment scam?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15055829</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/732594"><b>ronpin</b></A> : Trust me -- we have no need for any feeble broadband options here in the DFW area. BPL is only useful in those rural areas where it is impossible to make a profit anyway.<br><br>Please watch "Current Communications" bleed huge sums of your 401K "investor" dollars into the coffers of their CEO and pals -- before going bankrupt. Here we go again :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15055829</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:59:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
