<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: What is the problem with it? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14867731</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:08:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:08:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: FIRST U.S. CITY-WIDE BROADBAND OVER POWER LINE</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14879013</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by guest01 :</SMALL><BR><BR>In AUSTRALIA: Tasmania powers up 12Mbps broadband over powerlines !!!<br>By Munir Kotadia, ZDNet Australia<br>13 September 2005 04:46 PM  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Tasmania_powers_up_12Mbps_broadband/0,2000061791,39211616,00.htm" >www.zdnet.com.au/news/communicat&middot;&middot;&middot;6,00.htm</A><br><br>REMEMBER... BPL delivers the same hi-speed download and upload... which in theory, we could use VIDEO-Phone calls without lag or delay in transmission... back and forth !!!<br> </DIV>Hello, Unknown Investor!  Symmetrical bandwidth and network latency are two different things.  In theory you could use cable, dsl, wireless, or fiber for video phones as well.<br><br>I like the statement in the article about BPL being capable of going faster than ADSL2+ which uses "analogue lines".  It's funny how they throw stones at analog lines while BPL uses the worst medium known to man for broadband transmission and continues to struggle with making it work and dealing with the side effects.  And somehow BPL's unproven future potential beats what competitors offer today.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14879013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:52:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FIRST U.S. CITY-WIDE BROADBAND OVER POWER LINE</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14877879</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : In AUSTRALIA: Tasmania powers up 12Mbps broadband over powerlines !!!<br>By Munir Kotadia, ZDNet Australia<br>13 September 2005 04:46 PM  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Tasmania_powers_up_12Mbps_broadband/0,2000061791,39211616,00.htm" >www.zdnet.com.au/news/communicat&middot;&middot;&middot;6,00.htm</A><br><br>REMEMBER... BPL delivers the same hi-speed download and upload... which in theory, we could use VIDEO-Phone calls without lag or delay in transmission... back and forth !!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14877879</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:29:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FIRST U.S. CITY-WIDE BROADBAND OVER POWER LINE</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14872816</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : There you are.  <br><br>You do know this article is over a month old. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14872816</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:27:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>FIRST U.S. CITY-WIDE BROADBAND OVER POWER LINE</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14872306</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : COMTek NEWS RELEASE<br>October 05, 2005<br><br>MAJOR U.S. TECHNOLOGY MILESTONE:<br>COMTek, CITY OF MANASSAS DELIVER FIRST CITY-WIDE <br>AVAILABILITY OF BROADBAND OVER POWERLINE (BPL) IN THE U.S.<br><br> <br><br>RE: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.comtechnologies.com/pr_10_05_05.htm" >www.comtechnologies.com/pr_10_05_05.htm</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14872306</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:40:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What is the problem with it?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14867731</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/829559"><b>Estragon</b></A> : If you want to pick out only one problem with BPL and call it <B> the </B> problem, the big problem is that the utility companies cannot figure out how to make any money using BPL.<br><br>The typical BPL trial seems to end early with this style of announcement:<br><BLOCKQUOTE><br>We are ending the trial.  It was successful and we learned alot.  Oh, and we will not be deploying BPL at this time.<br></BLOCKQUOTE><br>We are left to guess at the reasons why.  It could be: <UL><br>&#8226; We could not solve the RF interference problems. </LI><br>&#8226; Solving the RF interference problems made the costs of deployment too high. </LI><br>&#8226; RF interference was not a problem, but the deployment costs are always higher than the costs of DSL (or cable, or FIOS, or ...). </LI><br></UL> The BPL equipment makers claim that the RF interference problem has been solved.  If so, it appears that there is no business model with a high enough ROI for the utility companies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14867731</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:31:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What is the problem with it?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14866915</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : FAQ: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html" >www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14866915</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:56:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What is the problem with it?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14866244</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/689533"><b>statecop</b></A> : Is it something to do with the speed, latency, or does it have sort of distance limits similar to dsl?<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.SRTunderground.us" >www.SRTunderground.us</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14866244</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:36:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
