<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Tranzeo cpq200&#x27;s and ROR1000 access points in Wireless Service Providers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14856184</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:08:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:08:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Tranzeo cpq200&#x27;s and ROR1000 access points</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856809</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1249536"><b>PersComp</b></A> : Hey Caleb,<br>Please keep mine looking and costing as they are!!  :D<br>No complaints here!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856809</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:13:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tranzeo cpq200&#x27;s and ROR1000 access points</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856245</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  harmetp <A HREF="/useremail/u/1260994"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>...(the deliberant just doesn't look high dollar enough for my partner)... </DIV>Caleb (Bito) will be MORE THAN HAPPY to boost the price up and give you a "good-lookin' box" so yer partner will feel happy...!!<br><br>;)<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856245</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:07:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Tranzeo cpq200&#x27;s and ROR1000 access points</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856184</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1260994"><b>harmetp</b></A> : We've been installing a mix of tranzeo and deliberant CPE's lately (the deliberant just doesn't look high dollar enough for my partner).  At one ap we have 2 tranzeo 6500's on sectors which seem to be pretty stable now; however, at another site we using an ROR1000 and the tranzeo's that are farther away (>3miles) are acting funny.  The ror's show a good signal from the tranzeo and the tranzeo shows a reasonable signal (all lights on), but the ping times are high (>200ms) and it tends to loose connection when using remote desktop to a server in the network.  I updated the firmware with no improvement then started reducing the output power (this is an unamped Cpe).  The ping times were best down at 11 for a power level.  However, 2 weeks later the problem came back and I raised the power to 18 and I think it's ok now.  I've noticed that introduction of tranzeo cpe's tends to correlate with some wireless problems with demarc aps, but they seemed ok with the ror.  Any similar experiences or ideas?<br><br>Thanks, Pat]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856184</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:57:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
