<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14854946</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:35:52 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:35:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14862328</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379790"><b>phattieg</b></A> : My credit is screwed up, and I won't pay a deposit if I can't "own" the phone they give me up front.  So I went with AT&T GoPhone, and kept my plan thru the merger.  I love hearing people complain about the new GoPhone rates.  Here is a before and after comparison.  Before, I would pay $43.99 a month for 400 anytime minutes, free nights & weekends, free incoming text messages, and $.01 per KB.  Now, anyone new going on that plan has to pay $.10 per text message, only gets 1000 night and weekend minutes, and $.03 per KB.  The plan is also more expensive too, I think they charge $49 for it.  I just add minutes every 2 months to keep the plan.  Gotta love it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14862328</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:41:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856903</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/511252"><b>biggbrother</b></A> : I don't think it makes any sense.  They spent millions on an AD campaign to inform the public that Cingular was formerly AT&T wireless.  Now their going to do the same to make Cingular to AT&T Wireless? :uhh:<br><br>In the meantime, companies like Verizon Wireless to continue to gain marketshare with a consistent message of a better quality network. "Can you hear me now?"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14856903</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:26:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854946</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/121311"><b>metrodust</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I still have an AT&TWS phone (and plan).<br>I wonder how that will work out :p<br> </DIV>your service shouldnt change<br><SMALL>--<br>When you are leaving.. heaven is a distance not a place. --Carissas Weird</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854946</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:13:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854260</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : You guys are shining examples of what SBC is thinking. <br><br>AT&T is *JUST A NAME* sitting on top of SBC, the company. <br><br>I can call myself AT&T but does that make me the AT&T we all know?<br><br>If they keep the BUSINESS PRACTICES of AT&T, then that's another story.<br><br>But, if they think that the AT&T name will bring more business, I think they are wrong. People fled AT&T for copetition and the numbers show. They may gain recognition for the business world, but that's about it.<br><br>They should probably take the same path as Sprint & Nextel did with the Nextel name as a product line of Sprint. SBC, if they were smart, would stay SBC as the "company" and keep AT&T as a product name for business and enterprise services.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854260</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:43:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854236</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  NPGMBR <A HREF="/useremail/u/355744"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>After two year contract is done.  I'm going right back to ATT.<br> </DIV>Why wait? Pay the term fee and move along! They don't learn otherwise that their fees can't stop people. <br><br>Why continue to pay for sub par service to avoid the cancellation fee just because there is a "contract" remaining. Sounds like you are not thinking in the right direction. If you had 8 months left and you pay $65 - $85 a month for service (or what ever) then you are spenind that amount for service that sucks.<br><br>Makes no sense to let the term fee stop you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854236</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:39:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854221</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  clark252 <A HREF="/useremail/u/152368"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Ah, AT&T Wireless.  Use of that brand will bring back some fond memories of great service and support (NOT).<br><br>I suspect the public's memory is not all that short.<br> </DIV>NOTHING with the name AT&T will ever be graced with me as a customer. <br><br>When Media One became AT&T I went back to satellite. When they became comcast, I switched back. <br><br>I won't use their cellular, local, long distance, ANYTHING. <br><br>That company is a horrible shell of a business model gone wrong. They never respected their customer's wishes in regards to their over bearing marketing and their 7 am telemarketing calls. They have a history of, once you are a customer, of making you SPEAK to a computer for customer assistance. Ever tried getting an actual person (even from india) on the phone to get billing help - especially when their billing system would scew up all the time?<br><br>I know it's SBC taking the AT&T name, but in my view, AT&T WAS a good company at one time, but in their latter years was nothing more than the borg.<br><br>In today's world, I don't think the name matters as much any more. People aren't as stupid as the corporations give them credit.<br><br>The AT&T name did every thing possible to remove the two words, customer and service, from each other. Their attitude was that as long as they build a solid network, it would work - and no need to support customer because it was always THEIR fault anyway. (And then they built bug filled billing systems, and scam services) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854221</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:36:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854062</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1292647"><b>DSII</b></A> : I'm sure the amount of people you inform about the at&t billing system and the fact that they would leave, will bring at&t to their KNEES.  By the looks of your bank account, that can't be too many people. Ha Ha  at&t RISES AGAIN!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14854062</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:08:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853933</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : Cingular bites here. even with 4 bars, dropped calls are very common.<br><SMALL>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853933</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:52:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853500</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : I still have an AT&TWS phone (and plan).<br>I wonder how that will work out :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853500</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:50:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853350</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/897844"><b>N3OGH</b></A> : I had a bad experience in with AT&T a while ago when I still had POTS.  I don't care if they were selling the cure for the common cold and a machine that could turn tap water into gasoline, all in one.  If it hat their name on it, I wouldn't touch it! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853350</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:28:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853224</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1035911"><b>the niTz</b></A> : att was good cingular isnt<br><br>sprint is decent]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14853224</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:12:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852926</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1124364"><b>grumpygeek</b></A> : But... they are recognized for being the worst possible communications company around! Yeah, a few of us older folks remember the day when AT&T was truly Ma Bell, the company that led the way to new technologies, had world-class customer service, and was expensive - but worth it.<br><br>That was 20+ years ago, though. Now, when I think of AT&T, I think of fraudulant billing, "stuffing", slamming, oversubscribed cell networks, FCC complaints, botched product development and releases, inept management, and bad investments.<br><br>This is just plain stupid. I used to regard SBC as a good investment, if not a good supplier. Now I seriously question their judgement.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852926</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:31:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852898</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1276823"><b>nonner9</b></A> : i really haven't had any trouble with the actual service, aside from some spotty coverage here and there, but i choose to spend my money where a customer can be treated with some respect, which is not what i got from att wireless or cingular.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852898</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:26:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852665</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><b>tiger72</b></A> : come to t-mobile :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852665</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:49:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852524</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/355744"><b>NPGMBR</b></A> : I guess I was furtunate as my ATT Wireless service was flawless.  Never a dropped call when they switched to GSM.  But like a dummy I switched to Verizon last Dec and despite Verizon's every popular (can you hear me now) my moto would be "dammit.....dropped another one".<br><br>After two year contract is done.  I'm going right back to ATT.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852524</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:32:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852400</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1035911"><b>the niTz</b></A> : yea ur telling me i liked att wireless but with the change to cingular my bill went up 10 bucks for no reason and then when i cancelled it cause my contract expired they billed me for not using my phone the following month ??? called them and talked calmly (yea right) with 5 reps and 2 supervisors who finally talked to someone above them and got the ok to credit my account and not charge me and this month i got another bill for 10 bucks called them again and the first rep credited me right away hope its over :hmm::uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852400</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:15:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852320</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/605287"><b>verolom</b></A> : Well, it is not AT&T Wireless, it is Cingular with a new name on it.  The absorption of the old AT&T does not affect the wireless portion, that happened last year.  Likely the new name will something like at&t-mobile to confuse more people :)<br><br>Actually I miss the old AT&T Wireless.  Despite them over-billing people, their service was always acceptable to me, especially when I use my phone abroad.  <br><br>Can you say free incoming SMS?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852320</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:01:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852306</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><b>tiger72</b></A> : I think both names are widely known for their horrible service. If I were to give either the benefit of the doubt though, i'd give it to AT&T - the name which has the widest name recognition.<br><SMALL>--<br>|-In a fascist government, National Security ALWAYS overrides Personal Freedoms.-| |- &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml" >www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml</A> -|</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852306</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:58:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852099</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1276823"><b>nonner9</b></A> : i still remember getting double billed which cause an overdraft protection fee, and then that cause my account to go negative, so I had $35 dollars in extra fees to pay, which ATT/Cingular decided wasn't their fault and wouldn't reimburse me, which was surprising since my contract ended 10 days later, of course I didn't renew it, but I probably would have, if they had fixed their mistake...<br><br>Yes, I'm bashing ATT/Cingular... and if I can keep a few people from not doing business with them, then it will make me feel better knowing that ATT/Cingular screwed themselves a little bit by having poor customer service<br><br>So, doesn't ATT Wireless have more recognition for poor customer service, than cingular?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852099</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:26:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852078</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/753545"><b>manfmmd</b></A> : I'm guessing 2015...<br><br>Not only telecom break-ups, but big oil as well.  After all, we don't want Exxon/Mobil/ConocoPhillips/Shell/Chevron/Texaco/BP Inc. stifling competition now do we ;)<br><SMALL>--<br>huh?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852078</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:24:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852067</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/152368"><b>clark252</b></A> : Ah, AT&T Wireless.  Use of that brand will bring back some fond memories of great service and support (NOT).<br><br>I suspect the public's memory is not all that short.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852067</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:23:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Scrapping Cingular name good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852025</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : Nationally, the AT&T name has a much higher recognition level than Cingular. It probably will result in more sales. AT&T rises again. How long before the next breakup attempts?;)<br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx">Join Red Room Forum</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/a9o7w">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14852025</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:18:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
