Re: No Discount? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14833399 en Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:56:26 EDT Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:56:26 EDT Re: No Discount? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833460 pnh102 :
said by sMh See Profile :

They'll probably say that Usenet was a service provided to their customers free of charge, so they won't have to offer a reduced fee.
It's always fun when companies try to pull that crap. Would their customers have had Usenet access (previously) through Rogers if they were not paying Rogers for it? Of course not. That alone proves that it was not a "free service."
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833460 Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:51:18 EDT Re: No Discount? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833421 sMh : They'll probably say that Usenet was a service provided to their customers free of charge, so they won't have to offer a reduced fee.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833421 Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:44:54 EDT Re: No Discount? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833399 john1290 :
said by pnh102 See Profile :

I am sure Rogers will discount the price of their service now since they don't need to provide Usenet anymore.

Oh wait a minute, now Rogers customers will be paying more for less!
I was thinking the EXACT same thing. Somebody care to call Rogers and ask them what their lowered bill will be now that they done away with Usenet?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833399 Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:41:42 EDT No Discount? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833337 pnh102 : I am sure Rogers will discount the price of their service now since they don't need to provide Usenet anymore.

Oh wait a minute, now Rogers customers will be paying more for less!
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14833337 Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:33:15 EDT