<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>An open source mark like UL/CSA/Energy Star etc. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14809776</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:08:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:08:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: An open source mark like UL/CSA/Energy Star et</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14809826</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/905990"><b>hwstar0</b></A> : Looks like there might already be one.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://opensource.org/trademarks/opensource/web/opensource-110x95.png" >opensource.org/trademarks/openso&middot;&middot;&middot;0x95.png</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14809826</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:59:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>An open source mark like UL/CSA/Energy Star etc.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14809776</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/905990"><b>hwstar0</b></A> : We need a open source mark of approval on consumer goods with embedded processors to ensure the buyer is properly informed.<br><br>This will allow more of the public to steer clear of non-upgradable closed source electronics.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14809776</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:51:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
