<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: scorecard in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14742023</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:26:40 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:26:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: scorecard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14742023</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : They're just trying to sap bandwidth from other providers?  Wireless is crap?  Exactly what are you talking about, and what does it have to do with network neutrality?<br><br>Oh, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.  Never mind.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14742023</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:58:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: scorecard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14741430</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1242502"><b>WirelessMajr</b></A> : So what you're saying is that commercial wireless service should not exist?  And the laptop owners should all keep crowding hotspots, or using America's largest free wireless provider (linksys)?<br><br>I have to disagree with you.  Wireless is here to stay, and it is not crap as you so claim.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14741430</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 22:14:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: scorecard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14739465</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344321"><b>bmn</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by justncredible :</SMALL><br><br>They are just looking for a free handout.</DIV>Oookay...  Yeah, that's what network neutrality is all about. :hmm:<br><SMALL>--<br>This space intentionally left blank.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14739465</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:47:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: scorecard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14739263</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : They are idiots, they sound as if they have not built a decent network and are trying to sap bandwidth from other providers. They are just looking for a free handout. I would be worried if any company supports this, I would not work for them or invest in such a company. Wireless is crap anyways.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14739263</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:13:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: scorecard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14738846</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344321"><b>bmn</b></A> : Well, the principles were only posted yesterday if the article date is correct...   If there is only one provider on the list in six months then its time to worry.  <br><SMALL>--<br>This space intentionally left blank.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14738846</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:53:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>scorecard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14738699</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/252810"><b>rit56</b></A> : one company isn't very assuring.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14738699</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:25:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
