<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Whatever in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14568909</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:30:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:30:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14569615</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/552457"><b>Minister</b></A> : Yeah I think that's what the column hints at: Seems like they're faced with a choice here.<br><br>Either their network performance suffers, or they crack down on the very P2P file-trading they've in a round-about way been legally protecting....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14569615</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:13:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568909</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1071476"><b>Pony99CA</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Minister <A HREF="/useremail/u/552457"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Not true.  You do know the EFF is a legit digital rights outfit, yes?  P2P is clearly stated as a violation of the service.</DIV>That's kind of ironic, isn't it?  The EFF is one of the biggest defenders of P2P, but they don't want it on their network.  :uhh:<br><br>I think the EFF does <B>some</B> good work, but they end up taking a lot of really bad stances.  They're kind of like the ACLU of the computer world.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568909</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:25:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568846</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1124364"><b>grumpygeek</b></A> : The reality is actually not even that good; the "research" going on in tor consists apparently mostly of DDoS attacks, phishing, and blog-spamming. <br><br>Many hosts block any inbound IP connections from published TOR exit points.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568846</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:14:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568429</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/552457"><b>Minister</b></A> : Not true.  You do know the EFF is a legit digital rights outfit, yes?  P2P is clearly stated as a violation of the service.<br><br>The primary concept was to create a distribution method for researchers concerned about backlash to publish findings, not to create a distribution channel for the Metallica discography.... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568429</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:55:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568424</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/118623"><b>MxxCon</b></A> : yes, EFF knew EXACTLY what the tool was <U>designed</U> to be used for.<br><B>RETARDS</B> that use TOR for p2p are...retards<br>don't blame inventors of good ideas for idiots around the world.<br><SMALL>--<br>[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568424</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:54:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568401</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1032270"><b>FAQFixer</b></A> : What a crock.  The EFF knew EXACTLY what the tool was eventually going to be used for. They stated it was for, "whistle-blowers, political dissidents, researchers, and others concerned about exchanging information without authoritarian backlash" so they would not be liable like the Grokster case.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568401</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:50:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
